The control of authenticity of extra virgin olive oil (EVOO), one of the most defrauded food in the world, is based on many determinations of chemical and compositional parameters and, by the law, also on sensory analysis. It is well known that the sensory descriptors of an EVOO, both positives and negatives, are due to the presence of many specific volatile compounds, perceived by olfactory receptors. In particular, the compounds responsible for the recognized defects (winey, fusty, muddy, musty, rancid), and their biosynthetic or chemical origin are widely investigated in literature. On the other hand, also the presence of positive olfactory notes resembling herbs/fruits/vegetables can be linked to the olive varieties/quality and/or geographical origin, being the lipoxygenase enzymatic pathway influenced by both genetic and environmental factors. At now, the volatiles profile and/or the presence of specific volatile markers are not indicated as legal requirements to verify the authenticity of an EVOO, in terms of assessment to the quality category or belonging to specific quality standards (for example monovarietal or protected designation of origin/PDO). In this work, a set of samples sold in Italian markets as EVOOs, but different for geographical origin, were analysed by a FGC Electronic Nose to develop a fast gas chromatographic separation of volatile molecules by two short metal capillary columns of different polarities, mounted in parallel and connected to separate flame ionization detectors. The two chromatograms are elaborated to give a global olfactory fingerprint of the EVOO samples. Moreover, to confirm the identity of selected volatile molecules in the headspace of EVOOs, a solid phase micro-extraction (SPME) coupled to gas chromatographic separation and mass detection (GC-MS) was used. The research was carried out with the financial contribution of COOP Italia.

Comparison between volatiles analysis of extra virgin olive oils by flash gas chromatography (FGC) electronic nose and by solid phase micro-extraction (SPME) coupled with gas chromatography - mass spectrometry (GC-MS)

VALLI, ENRICO;TESINI, FEDERICA;BARBIERI, SARA;BENDINI, ALESSANDRA;DI LECCE, GIUSEPPE;GALLINA TOSCHI, TULLIA
2013

Abstract

The control of authenticity of extra virgin olive oil (EVOO), one of the most defrauded food in the world, is based on many determinations of chemical and compositional parameters and, by the law, also on sensory analysis. It is well known that the sensory descriptors of an EVOO, both positives and negatives, are due to the presence of many specific volatile compounds, perceived by olfactory receptors. In particular, the compounds responsible for the recognized defects (winey, fusty, muddy, musty, rancid), and their biosynthetic or chemical origin are widely investigated in literature. On the other hand, also the presence of positive olfactory notes resembling herbs/fruits/vegetables can be linked to the olive varieties/quality and/or geographical origin, being the lipoxygenase enzymatic pathway influenced by both genetic and environmental factors. At now, the volatiles profile and/or the presence of specific volatile markers are not indicated as legal requirements to verify the authenticity of an EVOO, in terms of assessment to the quality category or belonging to specific quality standards (for example monovarietal or protected designation of origin/PDO). In this work, a set of samples sold in Italian markets as EVOOs, but different for geographical origin, were analysed by a FGC Electronic Nose to develop a fast gas chromatographic separation of volatile molecules by two short metal capillary columns of different polarities, mounted in parallel and connected to separate flame ionization detectors. The two chromatograms are elaborated to give a global olfactory fingerprint of the EVOO samples. Moreover, to confirm the identity of selected volatile molecules in the headspace of EVOOs, a solid phase micro-extraction (SPME) coupled to gas chromatographic separation and mass detection (GC-MS) was used. The research was carried out with the financial contribution of COOP Italia.
2013
Book of Abstracts
38
38
Valli E.; Tesini F.; Barbieri S.; Bendini A.; Di Lecce G.; Gallina Toschi T.
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/203617
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact