Although work is increasingly globalized and mediated by technology, little research has accumulated on the role of culture in shaping individuals' preferences regarding the segmentation or integration of their work and family roles. This study examines the relationships between gender egalitarianism (the extent a culture has a fluid understanding of gender roles and promotes gender equality), gender, and boundary management preferences across 27 countries/territories. Based on a sample of 9362 employees, we found that the pattern of the relationship between gender egalitarianism and boundary management depends on the direction of segmentation preferences. Individuals from more gender egalitarian societies reported lower preferences to segment family-from-work (i.e., protect the work role from the family role); however, gender egalitarianism was not directly associated with preferences to segment work-from-family. Moreover, gender was associated with both boundary management directions such that women preferred to segment family-from-work and work-from-family more so than did men. As theorized, we found gender egalitarianism moderated the relationship between gender and segmentation preferences such that women's desire to protect family from work was stronger in lower (vs. higher) gender egalitarianism cultures. Contrary to expectations, women reported a greater preference to protect work from family than men regardless of gender egalitarianism. Implications for boundary management theory and the cross-national work-family literature are discussed.

Boundary management preferences from a gender and cross-cultural perspective / Allen T.; Beham B.; Ollier-Malaterre A.; Baierl A.; Alexandrova M.; Artiawati; Beauregard A.; Carvalho V.S.; Chambel M.J.; Cho E.; Coden da Silva B.; Dawkins S.; Escribano P.; Gudeta K.H.; Huang T.-P.; Jaga A.; Kost D.; Kurowska A.; Leon E.; Lewis S.; Lu C.-Q.; Martin A.; Morandin G.; Noboa F.; Offer S.; Ohu E.; Peters P.; Rajadhyaksha U.; Russo M.; Sohn Y.W.; Straub C.; Tammelin M.; Van Engen M.; Waismel-Manor R.. - In: JOURNAL OF VOCATIONAL BEHAVIOR. - ISSN 0001-8791. - STAMPA. - 148:(2024), pp. 103943.1-103943.15. [10.1016/j.jvb.2023.103943]

Boundary management preferences from a gender and cross-cultural perspective

Morandin G.;Russo M.;
2024

Abstract

Although work is increasingly globalized and mediated by technology, little research has accumulated on the role of culture in shaping individuals' preferences regarding the segmentation or integration of their work and family roles. This study examines the relationships between gender egalitarianism (the extent a culture has a fluid understanding of gender roles and promotes gender equality), gender, and boundary management preferences across 27 countries/territories. Based on a sample of 9362 employees, we found that the pattern of the relationship between gender egalitarianism and boundary management depends on the direction of segmentation preferences. Individuals from more gender egalitarian societies reported lower preferences to segment family-from-work (i.e., protect the work role from the family role); however, gender egalitarianism was not directly associated with preferences to segment work-from-family. Moreover, gender was associated with both boundary management directions such that women preferred to segment family-from-work and work-from-family more so than did men. As theorized, we found gender egalitarianism moderated the relationship between gender and segmentation preferences such that women's desire to protect family from work was stronger in lower (vs. higher) gender egalitarianism cultures. Contrary to expectations, women reported a greater preference to protect work from family than men regardless of gender egalitarianism. Implications for boundary management theory and the cross-national work-family literature are discussed.
2024
Boundary management preferences from a gender and cross-cultural perspective / Allen T.; Beham B.; Ollier-Malaterre A.; Baierl A.; Alexandrova M.; Artiawati; Beauregard A.; Carvalho V.S.; Chambel M.J.; Cho E.; Coden da Silva B.; Dawkins S.; Escribano P.; Gudeta K.H.; Huang T.-P.; Jaga A.; Kost D.; Kurowska A.; Leon E.; Lewis S.; Lu C.-Q.; Martin A.; Morandin G.; Noboa F.; Offer S.; Ohu E.; Peters P.; Rajadhyaksha U.; Russo M.; Sohn Y.W.; Straub C.; Tammelin M.; Van Engen M.; Waismel-Manor R.. - In: JOURNAL OF VOCATIONAL BEHAVIOR. - ISSN 0001-8791. - STAMPA. - 148:(2024), pp. 103943.1-103943.15. [10.1016/j.jvb.2023.103943]
Allen T.; Beham B.; Ollier-Malaterre A.; Baierl A.; Alexandrova M.; Artiawati; Beauregard A.; Carvalho V.S.; Chambel M.J.; Cho E.; Coden da Silva B.; Dawkins S.; Escribano P.; Gudeta K.H.; Huang T.-P.; Jaga A.; Kost D.; Kurowska A.; Leon E.; Lewis S.; Lu C.-Q.; Martin A.; Morandin G.; Noboa F.; Offer S.; Ohu E.; Peters P.; Rajadhyaksha U.; Russo M.; Sohn Y.W.; Straub C.; Tammelin M.; Van Engen M.; Waismel-Manor R.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Allen at al. Boundary management from a gender and cross-cultural perspective JVB 2024 pre-print.pdf

embargo fino al 30/11/2026

Tipo: Postprint
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate (CCBYNCND)
Dimensione 608.92 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
608.92 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/954750
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact