Recent findings highlight two facets of the two fundamental stereotype content dimensions of agency (i.e., ‘dominance’ and ‘competence’) and communality (i.e., ‘morality’ and ‘sociability’; e.g., Abele et al., 2016) with implications for understanding gender inequality in the workplace (e.g., Prati et al., 2019). Extending this research and contributing to the facial first impressions literature, we examined how these facets of agency and communality when inferred from White men’s and women’s faces, along with attractiveness, influence their leadership suitability. In three studies in the United Kingdom (total N = 424), using student and working samples and two managerial descriptions, we found an unexpected pattern of results, supported by an internal meta-analysis: attractiveness and competence were the most important predictors of hirability for all candidates. For women, dominance was the next most important predictor; for men, morality and sociability were more important than dominance. Moreover, morality and sociability were more important in evaluating men than women, while dominance was more important in evaluating women than men. Findings are discussed in terms of a ‘deficit bias’, whereby the qualities women and men are considered to lack – dominance for women, morality, and sociability for men – may be given more weight when evaluating their leadership suitability.

Pireddu, S., Bongiorno, R., Ryan, M.K., Rubini, M., Menegatti, M. (2022). The deficit bias: Candidate gender differences in the relative importance of facial stereotypic qualities to leadership hiring. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 61(2), 644-671 [10.1111/bjso.12501].

The deficit bias: Candidate gender differences in the relative importance of facial stereotypic qualities to leadership hiring

Pireddu, Sara
;
Rubini, Monica;Menegatti, Michela
2022

Abstract

Recent findings highlight two facets of the two fundamental stereotype content dimensions of agency (i.e., ‘dominance’ and ‘competence’) and communality (i.e., ‘morality’ and ‘sociability’; e.g., Abele et al., 2016) with implications for understanding gender inequality in the workplace (e.g., Prati et al., 2019). Extending this research and contributing to the facial first impressions literature, we examined how these facets of agency and communality when inferred from White men’s and women’s faces, along with attractiveness, influence their leadership suitability. In three studies in the United Kingdom (total N = 424), using student and working samples and two managerial descriptions, we found an unexpected pattern of results, supported by an internal meta-analysis: attractiveness and competence were the most important predictors of hirability for all candidates. For women, dominance was the next most important predictor; for men, morality and sociability were more important than dominance. Moreover, morality and sociability were more important in evaluating men than women, while dominance was more important in evaluating women than men. Findings are discussed in terms of a ‘deficit bias’, whereby the qualities women and men are considered to lack – dominance for women, morality, and sociability for men – may be given more weight when evaluating their leadership suitability.
2022
Pireddu, S., Bongiorno, R., Ryan, M.K., Rubini, M., Menegatti, M. (2022). The deficit bias: Candidate gender differences in the relative importance of facial stereotypic qualities to leadership hiring. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 61(2), 644-671 [10.1111/bjso.12501].
Pireddu, Sara; Bongiorno, Renata; Ryan, Michelle K.; Rubini, Monica; Menegatti, Michela
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Pireddu - British J Social Psychol - 2022 - The deficit bias Candidate gender differences in the relative importance of.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipo: Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale (CCBYNC)
Dimensione 516.24 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
516.24 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
bjso12501-sup-0001-supinfos1.docx

accesso aperto

Tipo: File Supplementare
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale (CCBYNC)
Dimensione 56.62 kB
Formato Microsoft Word XML
56.62 kB Microsoft Word XML Visualizza/Apri
bjso12501-sup-0002-supinfos2.xlsx

accesso aperto

Tipo: File Supplementare
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale (CCBYNC)
Dimensione 37.03 kB
Formato Microsoft Excel XML
37.03 kB Microsoft Excel XML Visualizza/Apri
bjso12501-sup-0003-supinfos3.xlsx

accesso aperto

Tipo: File Supplementare
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale (CCBYNC)
Dimensione 38.37 kB
Formato Microsoft Excel XML
38.37 kB Microsoft Excel XML Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/836658
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 2
  • Scopus 6
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 6
social impact