In recent years, urban agriculture (UA) projects have bloomed throughout the world, finding large applications also in the developed economies of the so-called Global North. As compared to projects in developing countries, where research has mainly targeted the contribution to food security, UA in the Global North has a stronger multifunctional connotation, and results in multiple combinations of farming purposes and business models pursued. The present review paper explores the contribution and role that UA plays in cities from the Global North, defining its functionalities toward ecosystem services (ES) provisioning and analyzing the factors that hinders and promote its regional diffusion and uptake. The manuscript integrates a description of UA growing systems, as well opportunities for crop diversification in the urban environment, and a comprehensive classification of UA business models. The distinctive features in terms of business models, farming purposes and farm size are then applied over an inventory of 470 UA projects in the Global North, allowing for a characterization and comparative analysis of distribution frequency of the different project typologies.
Orsini, F., Pennisi, G., Michelon, N., Minelli, A., Bazzocchi, G., Sanyé-Mengual, E., et al. (2020). Features and Functions of Multifunctional Urban Agriculture in the Global North: A Review. FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS, 4, 1-27 [10.3389/fsufs.2020.562513].
Features and Functions of Multifunctional Urban Agriculture in the Global North: A Review
Orsini, Francesco
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
;Pennisi, GiuseppinaData Curation
;Michelon, NicolaInvestigation
;Minelli, AlbertoMembro del Collaboration Group
;Bazzocchi, GiovanniMembro del Collaboration Group
;Sanyé-Mengual, EstherData Curation
;Gianquinto, GiorgioSupervision
2020
Abstract
In recent years, urban agriculture (UA) projects have bloomed throughout the world, finding large applications also in the developed economies of the so-called Global North. As compared to projects in developing countries, where research has mainly targeted the contribution to food security, UA in the Global North has a stronger multifunctional connotation, and results in multiple combinations of farming purposes and business models pursued. The present review paper explores the contribution and role that UA plays in cities from the Global North, defining its functionalities toward ecosystem services (ES) provisioning and analyzing the factors that hinders and promote its regional diffusion and uptake. The manuscript integrates a description of UA growing systems, as well opportunities for crop diversification in the urban environment, and a comprehensive classification of UA business models. The distinctive features in terms of business models, farming purposes and farm size are then applied over an inventory of 470 UA projects in the Global North, allowing for a characterization and comparative analysis of distribution frequency of the different project typologies.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Orsini et al 2020.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipo:
Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza:
Licenza per accesso libero gratuito
Dimensione
2.28 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
2.28 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Supplementary_Material S1.docx
accesso aperto
Descrizione: Supplementary Table 1. Cropped area, farming purpose (Thomaier et al., 2015) and business models (Pölling et al., 2015) in selected UA projects in the Global North.
Tipo:
File Supplementare
Licenza:
Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione (CCBY)
Dimensione
806.99 kB
Formato
Microsoft Word XML
|
806.99 kB | Microsoft Word XML | Visualizza/Apri |
Supplementary_Material S2.docx
accesso aperto
Descrizione: Supplementary Table 2. A cell by cell comparison of the standardized residuals for the contingency table for the relation between business model and class of project dimensions (n=399). The three components of each cell from top to bottom are the observed counts, the percentage (%) of the total count, and (in italic) the standardized residuals. The cells with standardized residuals in bold font are those that exceeded the corresponding z-value of the Bonferroni-adjusted alpha at significance 0.05 (in this case α= 0.001 with z-value = +/- 3.28 after adjustment).
Tipo:
File Supplementare
Licenza:
Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione (CCBY)
Dimensione
663.13 kB
Formato
Microsoft Word XML
|
663.13 kB | Microsoft Word XML | Visualizza/Apri |
Supplementary_Material S3.docx
accesso aperto
Descrizione: Supplementary Table 3. A cell by cell comparison of the standardized residuals for the contingency table for the relation between farming purpose and class of projects dimension (n=407). The three components of each cell from top to bottom are the observed counts, the percentage (%) of the total count, and (in italic) the standardized residuals. The cells with standardized residuals in bold font are those that exceeded the corresponding z-value of the Bonferroni-adjusted alpha at significance 0.05 (in this case α= 0.001 with z-value = +/- 3.28 after adjustment).
Tipo:
File Supplementare
Licenza:
Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione (CCBY)
Dimensione
663.08 kB
Formato
Microsoft Word XML
|
663.08 kB | Microsoft Word XML | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.