This paper wants to explore quantitative and qualitative practices generally exploited in different scientific fields (philology, mathematics, quantitative linguistics, computer science) in order to reveal forgery. Our study will be conducted on Montale's Diario postumo that shows all the typical features of a suspected forgery. The final aim is to merge all these methods in order to define a taxonomy of annotation elements useful, in this particular context of authorship attribution, for developing a data model to be potentially used in all forgery situations.
F. Tomasi, I. Bartolini, F. Condello, M. Degli Esposti, V. Garulli, M. Viale (2013). Towards a taxonomy of suspected forgery in authorship attribution field. A case: Montale’s Diario Postumo. New York New York : ACM Press [10.1145/2517978.2517989].
Towards a taxonomy of suspected forgery in authorship attribution field. A case: Montale’s Diario Postumo
TOMASI, FRANCESCA;BARTOLINI, ILARIA;CONDELLO, FEDERICO;DEGLI ESPOSTI, MIRKO;GARULLI, VALENTINA;VIALE, MATTEO
2013
Abstract
This paper wants to explore quantitative and qualitative practices generally exploited in different scientific fields (philology, mathematics, quantitative linguistics, computer science) in order to reveal forgery. Our study will be conducted on Montale's Diario postumo that shows all the typical features of a suspected forgery. The final aim is to merge all these methods in order to define a taxonomy of annotation elements useful, in this particular context of authorship attribution, for developing a data model to be potentially used in all forgery situations.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
