This study examines consumers’ willingness to pay (WTP) for mountain wines and assesses the potential impact of extending the EU quality term “mountain product” to the wine sector. A discrete choice experiment was conducted with 256 wine consumers from the Veneto region, Italy. Participants were presented with various wine options featuring different attributes, including a mountain designation, organic certification, and price. The multinomial logit model was used to analyse consumer preferences and estimate WTP. Consumers have a positive willingness to pay for mountain wines and for organic wines, with the two labels contributing independently to consumer utility. Price, mountain designation, and organic certification were the most influential factors in the decision-making process. In addition, environmental awareness and the perception of mountain wines had a significant impact on consumer choice. These findings provide actionable insights for policymakers and producers, highlighting the potential of the “mountain product” label as a tool for sustainable rural development.
Maesano, G., Sidali, K., Baroni, A., Spadoni, R. (2026). High-Altitude, High Value? Consumer preferences and willingness to pay for Mountain Wines. ECONOMIA AGRO-ALIMENTARE, 28(1), 127-154 [10.3280/ecag2026oa21367].
High-Altitude, High Value? Consumer preferences and willingness to pay for Mountain Wines
Giulia Maesano
;Roberta Spadoni
2026
Abstract
This study examines consumers’ willingness to pay (WTP) for mountain wines and assesses the potential impact of extending the EU quality term “mountain product” to the wine sector. A discrete choice experiment was conducted with 256 wine consumers from the Veneto region, Italy. Participants were presented with various wine options featuring different attributes, including a mountain designation, organic certification, and price. The multinomial logit model was used to analyse consumer preferences and estimate WTP. Consumers have a positive willingness to pay for mountain wines and for organic wines, with the two labels contributing independently to consumer utility. Price, mountain designation, and organic certification were the most influential factors in the decision-making process. In addition, environmental awareness and the perception of mountain wines had a significant impact on consumer choice. These findings provide actionable insights for policymakers and producers, highlighting the potential of the “mountain product” label as a tool for sustainable rural development.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
06_ECAGOA_01-26+Maesano+etal.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipo:
Versione (PDF) editoriale / Version Of Record
Licenza:
Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate (CCBYNCND)
Dimensione
902.56 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
902.56 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.



