Aim/Purpose: This paper critically examines how remote and hybrid work, though widely celebrated for increasing flexibility and sustainability, can reproduce or exacerbate structural, organizational, and psychological inequalities among employees. Background: While remote work is often associated with positive outcomes, mainstream discussions underrepresent the disparities it can generate. This paper addresses this gap by applying a Critical Work and Organizational Psychology (CWOP) perspective to analyze inequities across access, control, and well-being. Methodology: This is a concept-driven critical review. The selection of literature prioritized theoretical depth and relevance rather than exhaustive coverage. The analysis is interpretative and interdisciplinary, informed by work psychology, organizational studies, and labor sociology. Contribution: The paper introduces a multidimensional critique of remote work, offering theoretical insights and practical recommendations to promote equity in remote and hybrid work environments. Findings: Remote work access is stratified by job level, socioeconomic status, and digital infrastructure. Organizational control, biased monitoring, and visibility bias reinforce hierarchies. Individual disparities, such as psychological capital, caregiving burdens, and digital competence, further marginalize certain groups. Recommendations for Practitioners: Organizations should adopt role-based eligibility, provide equitable resources, use outcome-based evaluations, and support caregivers and mental health needs. Recommendations for Researchers: Future studies should assess the long-term impact of remote work on marginalized groups and examine how emerging technologies affect workplace equity. Impact on Society: The findings highlight the risk that remote work may deepen societal inequalities if equity is not a central design goal. Future Research: Research should explore intersectional impacts and the ethical integration of AI and digital tools in remote work.

Toscano, F., Zappalà, S., Donati, S. (2025). The Dark Side of Remote Work: A Critical Review and a Call to Action to Address Remote Work Inequalities. INFORMING SCIENCE, 28, 1-20 [10.28945/5624].

The Dark Side of Remote Work: A Critical Review and a Call to Action to Address Remote Work Inequalities

Ferdinando Toscano
;
Salvatore Zappalà;Simone Donati
2025

Abstract

Aim/Purpose: This paper critically examines how remote and hybrid work, though widely celebrated for increasing flexibility and sustainability, can reproduce or exacerbate structural, organizational, and psychological inequalities among employees. Background: While remote work is often associated with positive outcomes, mainstream discussions underrepresent the disparities it can generate. This paper addresses this gap by applying a Critical Work and Organizational Psychology (CWOP) perspective to analyze inequities across access, control, and well-being. Methodology: This is a concept-driven critical review. The selection of literature prioritized theoretical depth and relevance rather than exhaustive coverage. The analysis is interpretative and interdisciplinary, informed by work psychology, organizational studies, and labor sociology. Contribution: The paper introduces a multidimensional critique of remote work, offering theoretical insights and practical recommendations to promote equity in remote and hybrid work environments. Findings: Remote work access is stratified by job level, socioeconomic status, and digital infrastructure. Organizational control, biased monitoring, and visibility bias reinforce hierarchies. Individual disparities, such as psychological capital, caregiving burdens, and digital competence, further marginalize certain groups. Recommendations for Practitioners: Organizations should adopt role-based eligibility, provide equitable resources, use outcome-based evaluations, and support caregivers and mental health needs. Recommendations for Researchers: Future studies should assess the long-term impact of remote work on marginalized groups and examine how emerging technologies affect workplace equity. Impact on Society: The findings highlight the risk that remote work may deepen societal inequalities if equity is not a central design goal. Future Research: Research should explore intersectional impacts and the ethical integration of AI and digital tools in remote work.
2025
Toscano, F., Zappalà, S., Donati, S. (2025). The Dark Side of Remote Work: A Critical Review and a Call to Action to Address Remote Work Inequalities. INFORMING SCIENCE, 28, 1-20 [10.28945/5624].
Toscano, Ferdinando; Zappalà, Salvatore; Donati, Simone
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
InfoSciV28Art030Toscano12142 (1).pdf

accesso aperto

Tipo: Versione (PDF) editoriale / Version Of Record
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale (CCBYNC)
Dimensione 649.43 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
649.43 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/1028157
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact