Ceftolozane/tazobactam is widely used against extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacterales, yet FDA-approved dosing relies on intermittent infusion and a fixed 2:1 ratio that assumes adequate β-lactamase inhibition. Tazobactam’s faster and variable clearance raises concerns for subtherapeutic exposure. This study evaluated whether continuous infusion (CI) improves pharmacokinetic target attainment and whether current dosing adequately covers both components. We conducted an analysis of 139 hospitalized adults receiving CI ceftolozane/tazobactam with therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). Free steady-state concentrations (fCss) and observed clearance were calculated and assessed across kidney function strata. Population pharmacokinetic modeling and Monte Carlo simulations evaluated the probability of target attainment (PTA) for each drug. Despite kidney function-adjusted CI, 38.1% of patients had tazobactam fCss <4 mg/L, a threshold linked to reduced efficacyefficacyefficacyand resistance emergence, while only 2.5% had ceftolozane fCss <8 mg/L (namely 4× MIC the Enterobacterales clinical breakpoint for susceptibility). Tazobactam clearance (mean 7.41 L/h) was 2.5-fold higher than ceftolozane and highly variable (CV 115%). Kidney function explained only 23% of clearance variability. The cohort’s older age (median 66 years; 26.6% ≥75 years) likely led to lower tazobactam clearance, suggesting even greater underexposure in younger patients. Simulations showed standard dosing achieved only 29%–54% cumulative response against ESBL-producing Enterobacterales, versus 73%–82% with optimized regimens using 2–3× higher ceftolozane/tazobactam doses of magnitude similar to those licensed for pneumonia. Current ceftolozane/tazobactam dosing, even with CI, is often subtherapeutic for tazobactam. These find ings challenge fixed-ratio formulations and support individualized, component-guided dosing to preserve efficacy and suppress resistance.
Pai, M.P., Cojutti, P.G., Gatti, M., Rinaldi, M., Tonetti, T., Siniscalchi, A., et al. (2025). Keeping the horse with the cart: are we underdosing tazobactam even when using continuous-infusion ceftolozane/tazobactam for effectively preventing resistance development by ESBL-producing Enterobacterales?. ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, Early Access, 1-11 [10.1128/aac.01215-25].
Keeping the horse with the cart: are we underdosing tazobactam even when using continuous-infusion ceftolozane/tazobactam for effectively preventing resistance development by ESBL-producing Enterobacterales?
Cojutti, Pier Giorgio
;Gatti, Milo;Rinaldi, Matteo;Tonetti, Tommaso;Viale, Pierluigi;Pea, Federico
2025
Abstract
Ceftolozane/tazobactam is widely used against extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacterales, yet FDA-approved dosing relies on intermittent infusion and a fixed 2:1 ratio that assumes adequate β-lactamase inhibition. Tazobactam’s faster and variable clearance raises concerns for subtherapeutic exposure. This study evaluated whether continuous infusion (CI) improves pharmacokinetic target attainment and whether current dosing adequately covers both components. We conducted an analysis of 139 hospitalized adults receiving CI ceftolozane/tazobactam with therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). Free steady-state concentrations (fCss) and observed clearance were calculated and assessed across kidney function strata. Population pharmacokinetic modeling and Monte Carlo simulations evaluated the probability of target attainment (PTA) for each drug. Despite kidney function-adjusted CI, 38.1% of patients had tazobactam fCss <4 mg/L, a threshold linked to reduced efficacyefficacyefficacyand resistance emergence, while only 2.5% had ceftolozane fCss <8 mg/L (namely 4× MIC the Enterobacterales clinical breakpoint for susceptibility). Tazobactam clearance (mean 7.41 L/h) was 2.5-fold higher than ceftolozane and highly variable (CV 115%). Kidney function explained only 23% of clearance variability. The cohort’s older age (median 66 years; 26.6% ≥75 years) likely led to lower tazobactam clearance, suggesting even greater underexposure in younger patients. Simulations showed standard dosing achieved only 29%–54% cumulative response against ESBL-producing Enterobacterales, versus 73%–82% with optimized regimens using 2–3× higher ceftolozane/tazobactam doses of magnitude similar to those licensed for pneumonia. Current ceftolozane/tazobactam dosing, even with CI, is often subtherapeutic for tazobactam. These find ings challenge fixed-ratio formulations and support individualized, component-guided dosing to preserve efficacy and suppress resistance.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
aac.01215-25-s0001.docx
accesso aperto
Tipo:
File Supplementare
Licenza:
Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione (CCBY)
Dimensione
899.54 kB
Formato
Microsoft Word XML
|
899.54 kB | Microsoft Word XML | Visualizza/Apri |
|
pai-et-al-2025-keeping-the-horse-with-the-cart-are-we-underdosing-tazobactam-even-when-using-continuous-infusion.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipo:
Versione (PDF) editoriale / Version Of Record
Licenza:
Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione (CCBY)
Dimensione
627.59 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
627.59 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


