Observers can learn to resist distraction in visual search when feature singletons or luminance transients are repeatedly presented across trials at a given location. In this study, we investigated whether the same repetition benefit would be observed when luminance transients are repeatedly shown at the same location within the same trial, and how this effect relates to across-trials habituation of attentional capture. The results showed that interference was reduced when four luminance transients were presented at the same location before target appearance, compared to when a single transient was presented, replicating the feature singleton findings. Furthermore, the magnitude of this repetition effect did not depend on the local and global across-trials probability of repeated and single transients, supporting the hypothesis that two relatively independent within-trial and across-trials habituation mechanisms coexist. Finally, in Experiment 4, we demonstrated that the repetition effect was largely reduced when the first three transients appeared at a different location, ruling out the possibility that the repetition benefit was simply because of a warning effect and/or the spatial predictability of the last visual transient.

Valsecchi, M., Turatto, M. (2025). Within-Trial and Across-Trials Habituation Mechanisms to Irrelevant Visual Transients. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 51(9), 1234-1249 [10.1037/xhp0001343].

Within-Trial and Across-Trials Habituation Mechanisms to Irrelevant Visual Transients

Valsecchi, M
;
2025

Abstract

Observers can learn to resist distraction in visual search when feature singletons or luminance transients are repeatedly presented across trials at a given location. In this study, we investigated whether the same repetition benefit would be observed when luminance transients are repeatedly shown at the same location within the same trial, and how this effect relates to across-trials habituation of attentional capture. The results showed that interference was reduced when four luminance transients were presented at the same location before target appearance, compared to when a single transient was presented, replicating the feature singleton findings. Furthermore, the magnitude of this repetition effect did not depend on the local and global across-trials probability of repeated and single transients, supporting the hypothesis that two relatively independent within-trial and across-trials habituation mechanisms coexist. Finally, in Experiment 4, we demonstrated that the repetition effect was largely reduced when the first three transients appeared at a different location, ruling out the possibility that the repetition benefit was simply because of a warning effect and/or the spatial predictability of the last visual transient.
2025
Valsecchi, M., Turatto, M. (2025). Within-Trial and Across-Trials Habituation Mechanisms to Irrelevant Visual Transients. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 51(9), 1234-1249 [10.1037/xhp0001343].
Valsecchi, M; Turatto, M
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Valsecchi & Turatto 2025.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipo: Postprint / Author's Accepted Manuscript (AAM) - versione accettata per la pubblicazione dopo la peer-review
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione (CCBY)
Dimensione 928.02 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
928.02 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
pvis_a_2315811_sm1691.docx

accesso aperto

Tipo: File Supplementare
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione (CCBY)
Dimensione 25.36 kB
Formato Microsoft Word XML
25.36 kB Microsoft Word XML Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/1021290
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 2
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact