Moment magnitude M-w was first defined by Hiroo Kanamori in the late 1970s, when the availability of new force balance seismometers made it possible to measure the seismic moment M-0 with virtually no limits in the frequency passband. For this reason, M-w does not become saturated even for the largest earthquakes ever recorded. M-w has been chosen in such a way that it coincides best with the previous definitions of magnitude (M-s, M-L, m(b), etc.) on certain ranges of values but can deviate significantly from them within other ranges. A few years ago, Das and colleagues proposed a new moment magnitude scale M-wg with the aim of better reproducing the values of m(b) and M-s over their entire range and to better predict the energy E-S radiated by earthquakes. We show that there was no need to define such a new scale and that M-wg is not even optimal to achieve the goal of matching E-S.

Gasperini, P., Lolli, B. (2024). Comment on "A Seismic Moment Magnitude Scale" by Ranjit Das, Mukat Lal Sharma, Hans Raj Wason, Deepankar Choudhury, and Gabriel Gonzalez. BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 114(4), 2270-2274 [10.1785/0120230230].

Comment on "A Seismic Moment Magnitude Scale" by Ranjit Das, Mukat Lal Sharma, Hans Raj Wason, Deepankar Choudhury, and Gabriel Gonzalez

Gasperini, P
Primo
;
Lolli, B
Ultimo
2024

Abstract

Moment magnitude M-w was first defined by Hiroo Kanamori in the late 1970s, when the availability of new force balance seismometers made it possible to measure the seismic moment M-0 with virtually no limits in the frequency passband. For this reason, M-w does not become saturated even for the largest earthquakes ever recorded. M-w has been chosen in such a way that it coincides best with the previous definitions of magnitude (M-s, M-L, m(b), etc.) on certain ranges of values but can deviate significantly from them within other ranges. A few years ago, Das and colleagues proposed a new moment magnitude scale M-wg with the aim of better reproducing the values of m(b) and M-s over their entire range and to better predict the energy E-S radiated by earthquakes. We show that there was no need to define such a new scale and that M-wg is not even optimal to achieve the goal of matching E-S.
2024
Gasperini, P., Lolli, B. (2024). Comment on "A Seismic Moment Magnitude Scale" by Ranjit Das, Mukat Lal Sharma, Hans Raj Wason, Deepankar Choudhury, and Gabriel Gonzalez. BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 114(4), 2270-2274 [10.1785/0120230230].
Gasperini, P; Lolli, B
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/995083
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact