Stimuli that appear abruptly in the visual field or differ from the surrounding stimuli based on a given visual feature can capture attention and interfere with the visual search process if they are not targets. When both types of distractors appear with higher likelihood at a given location, observers can learn to reduce their impact (distractor-location effect). In the case of feature-singleton distractors, this can imply a cost for processing targets that appear at locations associated with a high distractor probability (target-location effect). This has been proposed as evidence that distractor interference originates in the competition between distractors and targets within an attentional map, whose inputs can be modified by experience. In this study, we conduct a series of experiments that confirmed previous finding related to feature-singleton distractors, but consistently showed that learning to predict the spatial occurrence of luminance transients induces a distractor-location effect in the absence of a target-location effect. Combining this finding with the fact that interference by luminance transients were larger when distractors were far from the target position, we suggest that different mechanisms are responsible for the reduction of distractor interference in the case of color singletons and luminance transients.
Valsecchi, M., Turatto, M. (2024). Learning to resist distraction by spatially predictable luminance transients and color singletons: same or different mechanisms?. VISUAL COGNITION, 32(9-10), 845-875 [10.1080/13506285.2024.2315811].
Learning to resist distraction by spatially predictable luminance transients and color singletons: same or different mechanisms?
Valsecchi M.
Primo
;
2024
Abstract
Stimuli that appear abruptly in the visual field or differ from the surrounding stimuli based on a given visual feature can capture attention and interfere with the visual search process if they are not targets. When both types of distractors appear with higher likelihood at a given location, observers can learn to reduce their impact (distractor-location effect). In the case of feature-singleton distractors, this can imply a cost for processing targets that appear at locations associated with a high distractor probability (target-location effect). This has been proposed as evidence that distractor interference originates in the competition between distractors and targets within an attentional map, whose inputs can be modified by experience. In this study, we conduct a series of experiments that confirmed previous finding related to feature-singleton distractors, but consistently showed that learning to predict the spatial occurrence of luminance transients induces a distractor-location effect in the absence of a target-location effect. Combining this finding with the fact that interference by luminance transients were larger when distractors were far from the target position, we suggest that different mechanisms are responsible for the reduction of distractor interference in the case of color singletons and luminance transients.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Manuscript_Author Version x IRIS.pdf
Open Access dal 24/08/2025
Tipo:
Postprint / Author's Accepted Manuscript (AAM) - versione accettata per la pubblicazione dopo la peer-review
Licenza:
Licenza per accesso libero gratuito
Dimensione
2.61 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
2.61 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
|
pvis_a_2315811_sm1691.docx
accesso aperto
Tipo:
File Supplementare
Licenza:
Licenza per accesso libero gratuito
Dimensione
25.36 kB
Formato
Microsoft Word XML
|
25.36 kB | Microsoft Word XML | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


