Approximately 6% of metastatic breast cancers arise de novo. While systemic therapy (ST) remains the treatment backbone as for patients with metachronous metastases, locoregional treatment (LRT) of the primary tumor remains a controversial method. The removal of the primary has an established role for palliative purposes, but it is unclear if it could also determine a survival benefit. Retrospective evidence and pre-clinical studies seem to support the removal of the primary as an effective approach to improve survival. On the other hand, most randomized evidence suggests avoiding LRT. Both retrospective and prospective studies suffer several limitations, ranging from selection bias and outdated ST to a small sample of patients. In this review we discuss available data and try to identify subgroups of patients which could benefit the most from LRT of the primary, to facilitate clinical practice decisions, and to hypothesize future studies design on this topic.

Locoregional treatment of de novo stage IV breast cancer in the era of modern oncology / Merloni F.; Palleschi M.; Gianni C.; Casadei C.; Curcio A.; Romeo A.; Rocchi M.; Cima S.; Sirico M.; Sarti S.; Cecconetto L.; Mariotti M.; Di Menna G.; De Giorgi U.. - In: FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY. - ISSN 2234-943X. - ELETTRONICO. - 13:(2023), pp. 1083297.1-1083297.8. [10.3389/fonc.2023.1083297]

Locoregional treatment of de novo stage IV breast cancer in the era of modern oncology

Palleschi M.;Cima S.;Sirico M.;De Giorgi U.
2023

Abstract

Approximately 6% of metastatic breast cancers arise de novo. While systemic therapy (ST) remains the treatment backbone as for patients with metachronous metastases, locoregional treatment (LRT) of the primary tumor remains a controversial method. The removal of the primary has an established role for palliative purposes, but it is unclear if it could also determine a survival benefit. Retrospective evidence and pre-clinical studies seem to support the removal of the primary as an effective approach to improve survival. On the other hand, most randomized evidence suggests avoiding LRT. Both retrospective and prospective studies suffer several limitations, ranging from selection bias and outdated ST to a small sample of patients. In this review we discuss available data and try to identify subgroups of patients which could benefit the most from LRT of the primary, to facilitate clinical practice decisions, and to hypothesize future studies design on this topic.
2023
Locoregional treatment of de novo stage IV breast cancer in the era of modern oncology / Merloni F.; Palleschi M.; Gianni C.; Casadei C.; Curcio A.; Romeo A.; Rocchi M.; Cima S.; Sirico M.; Sarti S.; Cecconetto L.; Mariotti M.; Di Menna G.; De Giorgi U.. - In: FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY. - ISSN 2234-943X. - ELETTRONICO. - 13:(2023), pp. 1083297.1-1083297.8. [10.3389/fonc.2023.1083297]
Merloni F.; Palleschi M.; Gianni C.; Casadei C.; Curcio A.; Romeo A.; Rocchi M.; Cima S.; Sirico M.; Sarti S.; Cecconetto L.; Mariotti M.; Di Menna G.; De Giorgi U.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Merloni_2023.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipo: Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione (CCBY)
Dimensione 433.28 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
433.28 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/965576
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 2
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
social impact