Background: Bloodstream infections (BSIs) by Gram-negative pathogens play a major role in intensive care patients, both in terms of prevalence and severity, especially if multi-drug resistant pathogens are involved. Early appropriate antibiotic therapy is therefore a cornerstone in the management of these patients, and growing evidence shows that implementation of a multidisciplinary team may improve patients' outcomes. Our aim was to evaluate the clinical and microbiological impact of the application of a multidisciplinary team on critically ill patients. Methods: Pre-post study enrolling critically ill patients with Gram negative bloodstream infection in intensive care unit. In the pre-intervention phase (from January until December 2018) patients were managed with infectious disease consultation on demand, in the post-intervention phase (from January until December 2022) patients were managed with a daily evaluation by a multidisciplinary team composed of intensivist, infectious disease physician, clinical pharmacologist and microbiologist. Results: Overall, 135 patients were enrolled during the study period, of them 67 (49.6%) in the pre-intervention phase and 68 (50.4%) in the post-intervention phase. Median age was 67 (58-75) years, sex male was 31.9%. Septic shock, the need for continuous renal replacement therapy and mechanical ventilation at BSI onset were similar in both groups, no difference of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO) prevalence was observed. In the post-phase, empirical administration of carbapenems decreased significantly (40.3% vs. 62.7%, p = 0.02) with an increase of appropriate empirical therapy (86.9% vs. 55.2%, p < 0.001) and a decrease of overall antibiotic treatment (12 vs. 16 days, p < 0.001). Despite no differences in delta SOFA and all-cause 30-day mortality, a significant decrease in microbiological failure (10.3% vs. 29.9%, p = 0.005) and a new-onset 30-day MDRO colonization (8.3% vs. 36.6%, p < 0.001) in the post-phase was reported. At multivariable analysis adjusted for main covariates, the institution of a multidisciplinary management team (MMT) was found to be protective both for new MDRO colonization [OR 0.17, 95%CI(0.05-0.67)] and microbiological failure [OR 0.37, 95%CI (0.14-0.98)]. Conclusions: The institution of a MMT allowed for an optimization of antimicrobial treatments, reflecting to a significant decrease in new MDRO colonization and microbiological failure among critically ill patients.

Impact of a multidisciplinary management team on clinical outcome in ICU patients affected by Gram-negative bloodstream infections: a pre-post quasi-experimental study / Rinaldi, Matteo; Gatti, Milo; Tonetti, Tommaso; Nocera, Domenico; Ambretti, Simone; Berlingeri, Andrea; Nigrisoli, Giacomo; Pierucci, Elisabetta; Siniscalchi, Antonio; Pea, Federico; Viale, Pierluigi; Giannella, Maddalena. - In: ANNALS OF INTENSIVE CARE. - ISSN 2110-5820. - ELETTRONICO. - 14:1(2024), pp. 36.1-36.10. [10.1186/s13613-024-01271-9]

Impact of a multidisciplinary management team on clinical outcome in ICU patients affected by Gram-negative bloodstream infections: a pre-post quasi-experimental study

Rinaldi, Matteo;Gatti, Milo;Tonetti, Tommaso
;
Nocera, Domenico;Ambretti, Simone;Nigrisoli, Giacomo;Pea, Federico;Viale, Pierluigi;Giannella, Maddalena
2024

Abstract

Background: Bloodstream infections (BSIs) by Gram-negative pathogens play a major role in intensive care patients, both in terms of prevalence and severity, especially if multi-drug resistant pathogens are involved. Early appropriate antibiotic therapy is therefore a cornerstone in the management of these patients, and growing evidence shows that implementation of a multidisciplinary team may improve patients' outcomes. Our aim was to evaluate the clinical and microbiological impact of the application of a multidisciplinary team on critically ill patients. Methods: Pre-post study enrolling critically ill patients with Gram negative bloodstream infection in intensive care unit. In the pre-intervention phase (from January until December 2018) patients were managed with infectious disease consultation on demand, in the post-intervention phase (from January until December 2022) patients were managed with a daily evaluation by a multidisciplinary team composed of intensivist, infectious disease physician, clinical pharmacologist and microbiologist. Results: Overall, 135 patients were enrolled during the study period, of them 67 (49.6%) in the pre-intervention phase and 68 (50.4%) in the post-intervention phase. Median age was 67 (58-75) years, sex male was 31.9%. Septic shock, the need for continuous renal replacement therapy and mechanical ventilation at BSI onset were similar in both groups, no difference of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO) prevalence was observed. In the post-phase, empirical administration of carbapenems decreased significantly (40.3% vs. 62.7%, p = 0.02) with an increase of appropriate empirical therapy (86.9% vs. 55.2%, p < 0.001) and a decrease of overall antibiotic treatment (12 vs. 16 days, p < 0.001). Despite no differences in delta SOFA and all-cause 30-day mortality, a significant decrease in microbiological failure (10.3% vs. 29.9%, p = 0.005) and a new-onset 30-day MDRO colonization (8.3% vs. 36.6%, p < 0.001) in the post-phase was reported. At multivariable analysis adjusted for main covariates, the institution of a multidisciplinary management team (MMT) was found to be protective both for new MDRO colonization [OR 0.17, 95%CI(0.05-0.67)] and microbiological failure [OR 0.37, 95%CI (0.14-0.98)]. Conclusions: The institution of a MMT allowed for an optimization of antimicrobial treatments, reflecting to a significant decrease in new MDRO colonization and microbiological failure among critically ill patients.
2024
Impact of a multidisciplinary management team on clinical outcome in ICU patients affected by Gram-negative bloodstream infections: a pre-post quasi-experimental study / Rinaldi, Matteo; Gatti, Milo; Tonetti, Tommaso; Nocera, Domenico; Ambretti, Simone; Berlingeri, Andrea; Nigrisoli, Giacomo; Pierucci, Elisabetta; Siniscalchi, Antonio; Pea, Federico; Viale, Pierluigi; Giannella, Maddalena. - In: ANNALS OF INTENSIVE CARE. - ISSN 2110-5820. - ELETTRONICO. - 14:1(2024), pp. 36.1-36.10. [10.1186/s13613-024-01271-9]
Rinaldi, Matteo; Gatti, Milo; Tonetti, Tommaso; Nocera, Domenico; Ambretti, Simone; Berlingeri, Andrea; Nigrisoli, Giacomo; Pierucci, Elisabetta; Siniscalchi, Antonio; Pea, Federico; Viale, Pierluigi; Giannella, Maddalena
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
s13613-024-01271-9.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipo: Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione (CCBY)
Dimensione 1.08 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.08 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
file supplementari.zip

accesso aperto

Tipo: File Supplementare
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione (CCBY)
Dimensione 46.48 kB
Formato Zip File
46.48 kB Zip File Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/965561
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact