Background: Hand-sewn intestinal resection and anastomosis are commonly performed in veterinary medicine. The outcome of the hand-sewn side-to-side anastomosis (SSA) technique has never been described and compared to other techniques in dogs and cats. Aim: The study aims to describe the side-to-side hand-sewn anastomosis technique in small animals and to compare it with the end-to-end technique. Methods: A retrospective evaluation of the clinical records of dogs and cats that underwent enterectomy between 2000 and 2020 and were treated with side-to-side or end-to-end anastomosis (EEA) was performed. Results: Of the 52 dogs and 16 cats included in the study, 19 dogs and 6 cats received an SSA, and the remaining received an EEA. No intraoperative complication was reported. However, short-term complication rates were comparable, and mortality rates in the EEA group were higher. At the same time, stenosis was a frequent complication of SSA and was never reported following EEA. Conclusion: End-to-end technique remains the gold standard for hand-sewn intestinal anastomosis in small animals. However, SSA can be considered for selected cases with acceptable morbidity and mortality rates.

Retrospective evaluation of a hand-sewn side-to-side intestinal anastomosis technique in dogs and cats / Ciammaichella L.; Foglia A.; Del Magno S.; Cola V.; Zanardi S.; Tinto D.; Capitani O.; Joechler M.; Pisoni L.. - In: OPEN VETERINARY JOURNAL. - ISSN 2226-4485. - ELETTRONICO. - 13:3(2023), pp. 278-287. [10.5455/OVJ.2023.v13.i3.4]

Retrospective evaluation of a hand-sewn side-to-side intestinal anastomosis technique in dogs and cats

Ciammaichella L.;Foglia A.;Del Magno S.
;
Cola V.;Zanardi S.;Tinto D.;Capitani O.;Joechler M.;Pisoni L.
2023

Abstract

Background: Hand-sewn intestinal resection and anastomosis are commonly performed in veterinary medicine. The outcome of the hand-sewn side-to-side anastomosis (SSA) technique has never been described and compared to other techniques in dogs and cats. Aim: The study aims to describe the side-to-side hand-sewn anastomosis technique in small animals and to compare it with the end-to-end technique. Methods: A retrospective evaluation of the clinical records of dogs and cats that underwent enterectomy between 2000 and 2020 and were treated with side-to-side or end-to-end anastomosis (EEA) was performed. Results: Of the 52 dogs and 16 cats included in the study, 19 dogs and 6 cats received an SSA, and the remaining received an EEA. No intraoperative complication was reported. However, short-term complication rates were comparable, and mortality rates in the EEA group were higher. At the same time, stenosis was a frequent complication of SSA and was never reported following EEA. Conclusion: End-to-end technique remains the gold standard for hand-sewn intestinal anastomosis in small animals. However, SSA can be considered for selected cases with acceptable morbidity and mortality rates.
2023
Retrospective evaluation of a hand-sewn side-to-side intestinal anastomosis technique in dogs and cats / Ciammaichella L.; Foglia A.; Del Magno S.; Cola V.; Zanardi S.; Tinto D.; Capitani O.; Joechler M.; Pisoni L.. - In: OPEN VETERINARY JOURNAL. - ISSN 2226-4485. - ELETTRONICO. - 13:3(2023), pp. 278-287. [10.5455/OVJ.2023.v13.i3.4]
Ciammaichella L.; Foglia A.; Del Magno S.; Cola V.; Zanardi S.; Tinto D.; Capitani O.; Joechler M.; Pisoni L.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Retrospective evaluation of a hand-sewn side-to-side intestinal anastomosis technique in dogs and cats.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipo: Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale (CCBYNC)
Dimensione 831.92 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
831.92 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/958748
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact