This scientific opinion focuses on the welfare of laying hens, pullets and layer breeders on farm. The most relevant husbandry systems used in Europe are described. For each system, highly relevant welfare consequences were identified, as well as related animal-based measures (ABMs), and hazards leading to the welfare consequences. Moreover, measures to prevent or correct the hazards and/or mitigate the welfare consequences are recommended. The highly relevant welfare consequences based on severity, duration and frequency of occurrence are bone lesions, group stress, inability to avoid unwanted sexual behaviour, inability to perform comfort behaviour, inability to perform exploratory or foraging behaviour, isolation stress, predation stress, resting problems, restriction of movement, skin disorders and soft tissue lesions and integument damage. The welfare consequences of non-cage compared to cage systems for laying hens are described and minimum enclosure characteristics are described for laying hens, pullets and layer breeders. Beak trimming, which causes negative welfare consequences and is conducted to reduce the prevalence and severity of pecking, is described as well as the risks associated with rearing of non-beak-trimmed flocks. Alternatives to reduce sharpness of the beak without trimming are suggested. Finally, total mortality, plumage damage, wounds, keel bone fractures and carcass condemnations are the most promising ABMs for collection at slaughterhouses to monitor the level of laying hen welfare on farm. Main recommendations include housing all birds in non-cage systems with easily accessible, elevated platforms and provision of dry and friable litter and access to a covered veranda. It is further recommended to implement protocols to define welfare trait information to encourage progress in genetic selection, implement measures to prevent injurious pecking, rear pullets with dark brooders and reduce male aggression in layer breeders.

Welfare of laying hens on farm / Nielsen S.S.; Alvarez J.; Bicout D.J.; Calistri P.; Canali E.; Drewe J.A.; Garin-Bastuji B.; Gonzales Rojas J.L.; Gortazar Schmidt C.; Herskin M.; Miranda Chueca M.A.; Padalino B.; Pasquali P.; Roberts H.C.; Spoolder H.; Stahl K.; Velarde A.; Viltrop A.; Winckler C.; Estevez I.; Guinebretiere M.; Rodenburg B.; Schrader L.; Tiemann I.; Van Niekerk T.; Ardizzone M.; Ashe S.; Hempen M.; Mosbach-Schulz O.; Rojo Gimeno C.; Van der Stede Y.; Vitali M.; Michel V.. - In: EFSA JOURNAL. - ISSN 1831-4732. - ELETTRONICO. - 21:2(2023), pp. e07789.1-e07789.188. [10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7789]

Welfare of laying hens on farm

Padalino B.;
2023

Abstract

This scientific opinion focuses on the welfare of laying hens, pullets and layer breeders on farm. The most relevant husbandry systems used in Europe are described. For each system, highly relevant welfare consequences were identified, as well as related animal-based measures (ABMs), and hazards leading to the welfare consequences. Moreover, measures to prevent or correct the hazards and/or mitigate the welfare consequences are recommended. The highly relevant welfare consequences based on severity, duration and frequency of occurrence are bone lesions, group stress, inability to avoid unwanted sexual behaviour, inability to perform comfort behaviour, inability to perform exploratory or foraging behaviour, isolation stress, predation stress, resting problems, restriction of movement, skin disorders and soft tissue lesions and integument damage. The welfare consequences of non-cage compared to cage systems for laying hens are described and minimum enclosure characteristics are described for laying hens, pullets and layer breeders. Beak trimming, which causes negative welfare consequences and is conducted to reduce the prevalence and severity of pecking, is described as well as the risks associated with rearing of non-beak-trimmed flocks. Alternatives to reduce sharpness of the beak without trimming are suggested. Finally, total mortality, plumage damage, wounds, keel bone fractures and carcass condemnations are the most promising ABMs for collection at slaughterhouses to monitor the level of laying hen welfare on farm. Main recommendations include housing all birds in non-cage systems with easily accessible, elevated platforms and provision of dry and friable litter and access to a covered veranda. It is further recommended to implement protocols to define welfare trait information to encourage progress in genetic selection, implement measures to prevent injurious pecking, rear pullets with dark brooders and reduce male aggression in layer breeders.
2023
Welfare of laying hens on farm / Nielsen S.S.; Alvarez J.; Bicout D.J.; Calistri P.; Canali E.; Drewe J.A.; Garin-Bastuji B.; Gonzales Rojas J.L.; Gortazar Schmidt C.; Herskin M.; Miranda Chueca M.A.; Padalino B.; Pasquali P.; Roberts H.C.; Spoolder H.; Stahl K.; Velarde A.; Viltrop A.; Winckler C.; Estevez I.; Guinebretiere M.; Rodenburg B.; Schrader L.; Tiemann I.; Van Niekerk T.; Ardizzone M.; Ashe S.; Hempen M.; Mosbach-Schulz O.; Rojo Gimeno C.; Van der Stede Y.; Vitali M.; Michel V.. - In: EFSA JOURNAL. - ISSN 1831-4732. - ELETTRONICO. - 21:2(2023), pp. e07789.1-e07789.188. [10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7789]
Nielsen S.S.; Alvarez J.; Bicout D.J.; Calistri P.; Canali E.; Drewe J.A.; Garin-Bastuji B.; Gonzales Rojas J.L.; Gortazar Schmidt C.; Herskin M.; Miranda Chueca M.A.; Padalino B.; Pasquali P.; Roberts H.C.; Spoolder H.; Stahl K.; Velarde A.; Viltrop A.; Winckler C.; Estevez I.; Guinebretiere M.; Rodenburg B.; Schrader L.; Tiemann I.; Van Niekerk T.; Ardizzone M.; Ashe S.; Hempen M.; Mosbach-Schulz O.; Rojo Gimeno C.; Van der Stede Y.; Vitali M.; Michel V.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
EFSA Journal 2023 Welfare of laying hens on farm.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipo: Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non opere derivate (CCBYND)
Dimensione 9.87 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
9.87 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/955390
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 15
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 4
social impact