Steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs) are widely used in human neuroscience studies and applications such as brain-computer interfaces. Surprisingly, no previous study has systematically evaluated different reference methods for SSVEP analysis, despite that signal reference is crucial for the proper assessment of neural activities. In the present study, using four datasets from our previous SSVEP studies (1-3) and three public datasets from other studies (4-6), we compared four reference methods: monopolar reference, common average reference, averaged-mastoids reference, and Laplacian reference. The quality of the resulting SSVEP signals was compared in terms of both signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) and reliability. The results showed that Laplacian reference, which uses signals at the maximally activated electrode after subtracting the average of the nearby electrodes to reduce common noise, gave rise to the highest SNRs. Furthermore, the Laplacian reference resulted in SSVEP signals that were highly reliable across recording sessions or trials. These results suggest that Laplacian reference is optimal for SSVEP studies and applications. Laplacian reference is especially advantageous for SSVEP experiments where short preparation time is preferred, since it requires only data from the maximally activated electrode and a few surrounding electrodes.

Zhang, Y., Valsecchi, M., Gegenfurtner, K.R., Chen, J. (2023). Laplacian reference is optimal for steady-state visual evoked potentials. JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 130(3), 557-568 [10.1152/jn.00469.2022].

Laplacian reference is optimal for steady-state visual evoked potentials

Valsecchi, Matteo;
2023

Abstract

Steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs) are widely used in human neuroscience studies and applications such as brain-computer interfaces. Surprisingly, no previous study has systematically evaluated different reference methods for SSVEP analysis, despite that signal reference is crucial for the proper assessment of neural activities. In the present study, using four datasets from our previous SSVEP studies (1-3) and three public datasets from other studies (4-6), we compared four reference methods: monopolar reference, common average reference, averaged-mastoids reference, and Laplacian reference. The quality of the resulting SSVEP signals was compared in terms of both signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) and reliability. The results showed that Laplacian reference, which uses signals at the maximally activated electrode after subtracting the average of the nearby electrodes to reduce common noise, gave rise to the highest SNRs. Furthermore, the Laplacian reference resulted in SSVEP signals that were highly reliable across recording sessions or trials. These results suggest that Laplacian reference is optimal for SSVEP studies and applications. Laplacian reference is especially advantageous for SSVEP experiments where short preparation time is preferred, since it requires only data from the maximally activated electrode and a few surrounding electrodes.
2023
Zhang, Y., Valsecchi, M., Gegenfurtner, K.R., Chen, J. (2023). Laplacian reference is optimal for steady-state visual evoked potentials. JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 130(3), 557-568 [10.1152/jn.00469.2022].
Zhang, Yuan; Valsecchi, Matteo; Gegenfurtner, Karl R; Chen, Jing
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Laplacian reference - Article+SSVEP+re-reference_Accepted.pdf

Open Access dal 30/08/2024

Tipo: Postprint
Licenza: Licenza per accesso libero gratuito
Dimensione 1.46 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.46 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/936953
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact