Objectives: Recent studies show that Test Positivity Rate (TPR) gains a better correlation than incidence with the number of hospitalized patients in COVID-19 pandemic. Nevertheless, epidemiologists remain sceptical concerning the widespread use of this metric for surveillance, and indicators based on known cases like incidence rate are still preferred de- spite the large number of asymptomatic carriers, which remain unknown. Our aim is to compare TPR and incidence rate, to determine which of the two has the best characteristics to predict the trend of hospitalized patients in the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: We perform a retrospective study considering 60 outbreak cases, using global and local data from Italy in different waves of the pandemic, in order to detect peaks in TPR time series, and peaks in incidence rate, finding which of the two indicators has the best ability to anticipate peaks in patients admitted in hospitals. Results: On average, the best TPR-based approach anticipates the incidence rate of about 4.6 days (95% CI 2.8, 6.4), more precisely the average distance between TPR peaks and hospitalized peaks is 17.6 days (95% CI 15.0, 20.4) with respect to 13.0 days (95% CI 10.4, 15.8) ob- tained for incidence. Moreover, the average difference between TPR and incidence rate increased to more than 6 days in the Delta outbreak during summer 2021, where presumably the percentage of asymptomatic carriers was larger. Conclusions: We conclude that TPR should be used as the primary indicator to enable early intervention, and for predicting hospital admissions in infectious diseases with asymptomatic carriers.

Mauro Gaspari (2023). The impact of Test Positivity on Surveillance with Asymptomatic Carriers. EPIDEMIOLOGIC METHODS, 11(s1), 1-13 [10.1515/em-2022-0125].

The impact of Test Positivity on Surveillance with Asymptomatic Carriers

Mauro Gaspari
2023

Abstract

Objectives: Recent studies show that Test Positivity Rate (TPR) gains a better correlation than incidence with the number of hospitalized patients in COVID-19 pandemic. Nevertheless, epidemiologists remain sceptical concerning the widespread use of this metric for surveillance, and indicators based on known cases like incidence rate are still preferred de- spite the large number of asymptomatic carriers, which remain unknown. Our aim is to compare TPR and incidence rate, to determine which of the two has the best characteristics to predict the trend of hospitalized patients in the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: We perform a retrospective study considering 60 outbreak cases, using global and local data from Italy in different waves of the pandemic, in order to detect peaks in TPR time series, and peaks in incidence rate, finding which of the two indicators has the best ability to anticipate peaks in patients admitted in hospitals. Results: On average, the best TPR-based approach anticipates the incidence rate of about 4.6 days (95% CI 2.8, 6.4), more precisely the average distance between TPR peaks and hospitalized peaks is 17.6 days (95% CI 15.0, 20.4) with respect to 13.0 days (95% CI 10.4, 15.8) ob- tained for incidence. Moreover, the average difference between TPR and incidence rate increased to more than 6 days in the Delta outbreak during summer 2021, where presumably the percentage of asymptomatic carriers was larger. Conclusions: We conclude that TPR should be used as the primary indicator to enable early intervention, and for predicting hospital admissions in infectious diseases with asymptomatic carriers.
2023
Mauro Gaspari (2023). The impact of Test Positivity on Surveillance with Asymptomatic Carriers. EPIDEMIOLOGIC METHODS, 11(s1), 1-13 [10.1515/em-2022-0125].
Mauro Gaspari
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
10.1515_em-2022-0125.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipo: Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza: Licenza per accesso libero gratuito
Dimensione 2.32 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.32 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/935013
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact