BRCA testing is recommended in all Ovarian Cancer (OC) patients, but the optimal approach is debated. The landscape of BRCA alterations was explored in 30 consecutive OC patients: 6 (20.0%) carried germline pathogenic variants, 1 (3.3%) a somatic mutation of BRCA2, 2 (6.7%) unclassified germline variants in BRCA1, and 5 (16.7%) hypermethylation of the BRCA1 promoter. Overall, 12 patients (40.0%) showed BRCA deficit (BD), due to inactivation of both alleles of either BRCA1 or BRCA2, while 18 (60.0%) had undetected/unclear BRCA deficit (BU). Regarding sequence changes, analysis performed on Formalin-Fixed-Paraffin-Embedded tissue through a validated diagnostic protocol showed 100% accuracy, compared with 96.3% for Snap-Frozen tissue and 77.8% for the pre-diagnostic Formalin-Fixed-Paraffin-Embedded protocol. BD tumors, compared to BU, showed a significantly higher rate of small genomic rearrangements. After a median follow-up of 60.3 months, the mean PFS was 54.9 ± 27.2 months in BD patients and 34.6 ± 26.7 months in BU patients (p = 0.055). The analysis of other cancer genes in BU patients identified a carrier of a pathogenic germline variant in RAD51C. Thus, BRCA sequencing alone may miss tumors potentially responsive to specific treatments (due to BRCA1 promoter methylation or mutations in other genes) while unvalidated FFPE approaches may yield false-positive results.

Characterization of BRCA Deficiency in Ovarian Cancer

Barbero, Giovanna;Zuntini, Roberta;Magini, Pamela;Desiderio, Laura;Perrone, Anna Myriam;Rubino, Daniela;Grippa, Mina;De Leo, Antonio;Ceccarelli, Claudio;Godino, Lea;Miccoli, Sara;De Iaco, Pierandrea;Zamagni, Claudio;Innella, Giovanni
;
Turchetti, Daniela
2023

Abstract

BRCA testing is recommended in all Ovarian Cancer (OC) patients, but the optimal approach is debated. The landscape of BRCA alterations was explored in 30 consecutive OC patients: 6 (20.0%) carried germline pathogenic variants, 1 (3.3%) a somatic mutation of BRCA2, 2 (6.7%) unclassified germline variants in BRCA1, and 5 (16.7%) hypermethylation of the BRCA1 promoter. Overall, 12 patients (40.0%) showed BRCA deficit (BD), due to inactivation of both alleles of either BRCA1 or BRCA2, while 18 (60.0%) had undetected/unclear BRCA deficit (BU). Regarding sequence changes, analysis performed on Formalin-Fixed-Paraffin-Embedded tissue through a validated diagnostic protocol showed 100% accuracy, compared with 96.3% for Snap-Frozen tissue and 77.8% for the pre-diagnostic Formalin-Fixed-Paraffin-Embedded protocol. BD tumors, compared to BU, showed a significantly higher rate of small genomic rearrangements. After a median follow-up of 60.3 months, the mean PFS was 54.9 ± 27.2 months in BD patients and 34.6 ± 26.7 months in BU patients (p = 0.055). The analysis of other cancer genes in BU patients identified a carrier of a pathogenic germline variant in RAD51C. Thus, BRCA sequencing alone may miss tumors potentially responsive to specific treatments (due to BRCA1 promoter methylation or mutations in other genes) while unvalidated FFPE approaches may yield false-positive results.
2023
Barbero, Giovanna; Zuntini, Roberta; Magini, Pamela; Desiderio, Laura; Bonaguro, Michela; Perrone, Anna Myriam; Rubino, Daniela; Grippa, Mina; De Leo, Antonio; Ceccarelli, Claudio; Godino, Lea; Miccoli, Sara; Ferrari, Simona; Santini, Donatella; De Iaco, Pierandrea; Zamagni, Claudio; Innella, Giovanni; Turchetti, Daniela
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
cancers-15-01530-v2.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipo: Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione (CCBY)
Dimensione 949.47 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
949.47 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
cancers-15-01530-s001 (1).zip

accesso aperto

Tipo: File Supplementare
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione (CCBY)
Dimensione 642.81 kB
Formato Zip File
642.81 kB Zip File Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/925077
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact