The 2017 version of the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) recommendations, by integrating cytogenetics and mutational status of specific genes, divides patients with acute myeloid leukemia into 3 prognostically distinct risk categories: favorable (ELN2017-FR), intermediate (ELN2017-IR), and adverse (ELN2017-AR). We performed a post hoc analysis of the GIMEMA (Gruppo Italiano Malattie EMatologiche dell'Adulto) AML1310 trial to investigate the applicability of the ELN2017 risk stratification to our study population. In this trial, after induction and consolidation, patients in complete remission were to receive an autologous stem cell transplant (auto-SCT) if categorized as favorable risk or an allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-SCT) if adverse risk. Intermediate-risk patients were to receive auto-SCT or allo-SCT based on the postconsolidation levels of measurable residual disease as measured by using flow cytometry. Risk categorization was originally conducted according to the 2009 National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommendations. Among 500 patients, 445 (89%) were reclassified according to the ELN2017 criteria: ELN2017-FR, 186 (41.8%) of 455; ELN2017-IR, 179 (40.2%) of 445; and ELN2017-AR, 80 (18%) of 455. In 55 patients (11%), ELN2017 was not applicable. Two-year overall survival (OS) was 68.8%, 51.3%, 45.8%, and 42.8% for the ELN2017-FR, ELN2017-IR, ELN2017-not classifiable, and ELN2017-AR groups, respectively (P < .001). When comparing the 2 different transplant strategies in each ELN2017 risk category, a significant benefit of auto-SCT over allo-SCT was observed among ELN2017-FR patients (2-year OS of 83.3% vs 66.7%; P = .0421). The 2 transplant procedures performed almost equally in the ELN2017-IR group (2-year OS of 73.9% vs 70.8%; P = .5552). This post hoc analysis of the GIMEMA AML1310 trial confirms that the ELN2017 classification is able to accurately discriminate patients with different outcomes and who may benefit from different transplant strategies.

ELN2017 risk stratification improves outcome prediction when applied to the prospective GIMEMA AML1310 protocol / Buccisano, Francesco; Palmieri, Raffaele; Piciocchi, Alfonso; Arena, Valentina; Candoni, Anna; Melillo, Lorella; Calafiore, Valeria; Cairoli, Roberto; de Fabritiis, Paolo; Storti, Gabriella; Salutari, Prassede; Lanza, Francesco; Martinelli, Giovanni; Luppi, Mario; Capria, Saveria; Maurillo, Luca; Del Principe, Maria Ilaria; Paterno, Giovangiacinto; Irno Consalvo, Maria Antonietta; Ottone, Tiziana; Lavorgna, Serena; Voso, Maria Teresa; Fazi, Paola; Vignetti, Marco; Arcese, William; Venditti, Adriano. - In: BLOOD ADVANCES. - ISSN 2473-9529. - ELETTRONICO. - 6:8(2022), pp. 2510-2516. [10.1182/bloodadvances.2021005717]

ELN2017 risk stratification improves outcome prediction when applied to the prospective GIMEMA AML1310 protocol

Arena, Valentina;Lanza, Francesco
Membro del Collaboration Group
;
Martinelli, Giovanni;
2022

Abstract

The 2017 version of the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) recommendations, by integrating cytogenetics and mutational status of specific genes, divides patients with acute myeloid leukemia into 3 prognostically distinct risk categories: favorable (ELN2017-FR), intermediate (ELN2017-IR), and adverse (ELN2017-AR). We performed a post hoc analysis of the GIMEMA (Gruppo Italiano Malattie EMatologiche dell'Adulto) AML1310 trial to investigate the applicability of the ELN2017 risk stratification to our study population. In this trial, after induction and consolidation, patients in complete remission were to receive an autologous stem cell transplant (auto-SCT) if categorized as favorable risk or an allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-SCT) if adverse risk. Intermediate-risk patients were to receive auto-SCT or allo-SCT based on the postconsolidation levels of measurable residual disease as measured by using flow cytometry. Risk categorization was originally conducted according to the 2009 National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommendations. Among 500 patients, 445 (89%) were reclassified according to the ELN2017 criteria: ELN2017-FR, 186 (41.8%) of 455; ELN2017-IR, 179 (40.2%) of 445; and ELN2017-AR, 80 (18%) of 455. In 55 patients (11%), ELN2017 was not applicable. Two-year overall survival (OS) was 68.8%, 51.3%, 45.8%, and 42.8% for the ELN2017-FR, ELN2017-IR, ELN2017-not classifiable, and ELN2017-AR groups, respectively (P < .001). When comparing the 2 different transplant strategies in each ELN2017 risk category, a significant benefit of auto-SCT over allo-SCT was observed among ELN2017-FR patients (2-year OS of 83.3% vs 66.7%; P = .0421). The 2 transplant procedures performed almost equally in the ELN2017-IR group (2-year OS of 73.9% vs 70.8%; P = .5552). This post hoc analysis of the GIMEMA AML1310 trial confirms that the ELN2017 classification is able to accurately discriminate patients with different outcomes and who may benefit from different transplant strategies.
2022
ELN2017 risk stratification improves outcome prediction when applied to the prospective GIMEMA AML1310 protocol / Buccisano, Francesco; Palmieri, Raffaele; Piciocchi, Alfonso; Arena, Valentina; Candoni, Anna; Melillo, Lorella; Calafiore, Valeria; Cairoli, Roberto; de Fabritiis, Paolo; Storti, Gabriella; Salutari, Prassede; Lanza, Francesco; Martinelli, Giovanni; Luppi, Mario; Capria, Saveria; Maurillo, Luca; Del Principe, Maria Ilaria; Paterno, Giovangiacinto; Irno Consalvo, Maria Antonietta; Ottone, Tiziana; Lavorgna, Serena; Voso, Maria Teresa; Fazi, Paola; Vignetti, Marco; Arcese, William; Venditti, Adriano. - In: BLOOD ADVANCES. - ISSN 2473-9529. - ELETTRONICO. - 6:8(2022), pp. 2510-2516. [10.1182/bloodadvances.2021005717]
Buccisano, Francesco; Palmieri, Raffaele; Piciocchi, Alfonso; Arena, Valentina; Candoni, Anna; Melillo, Lorella; Calafiore, Valeria; Cairoli, Roberto; de Fabritiis, Paolo; Storti, Gabriella; Salutari, Prassede; Lanza, Francesco; Martinelli, Giovanni; Luppi, Mario; Capria, Saveria; Maurillo, Luca; Del Principe, Maria Ilaria; Paterno, Giovangiacinto; Irno Consalvo, Maria Antonietta; Ottone, Tiziana; Lavorgna, Serena; Voso, Maria Teresa; Fazi, Paola; Vignetti, Marco; Arcese, William; Venditti, Adriano
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
advancesADV2021005717.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipo: Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate (CCBYNCND)
Dimensione 976.92 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
976.92 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
advancesADV2021005717-suppl1.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipo: File Supplementare
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate (CCBYNCND)
Dimensione 175.07 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
175.07 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/918420
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
social impact