Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of symmetrically and unsymmetrically substituted methoctramine-related polyamines as muscular nicotinic receptor noncompetitive antagonists

The universal template approach to drug design foresees that a polyamine can be modified in such a way to recognize any neurotransmitter receptor. Thus, hybrids of polymethylene tetraamines and philanthotoxins, exemplified by methoctramine (1) and PhTX-343 (2), respectively, were synthesized to produce novel inhibitors of muscular nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Polyamines 3-25 were synthesized and their biological profiles were evaluated at frog rectus abdominis muscle nicotinic receptors and guinea pig left atria (M-2) and ileum longitudinal muscle (M-3) muscarinic acetylcholine receptors. All of the compounds, like prototypes 1 and 2, were noncompetitive antagonists of nicotinic receptors while being, like 1, competitive antagonists at,muscarinic M-2 and M-3 receptor subtypes. interestingly, polyamines bearing a low number of methylenes between the nitrogen atoms, as in 3, 6, and 7, displayed a biological profile similar to that of 2: a noncompetitive antagonism at nicotinic receptors in the 7-25 mu M range while not showing any antagonism for muscarinic receptors up to 10 mu M. increasing the number of methylenes separating these nitrogen atoms in methoctramine related tetraamines resulted in a significant improvement; in potency at nicotinic receptors. The most potent tetraamine was 19, bearing a 12 methylene spacer between the nitrogen atoms, which was 12-fold and 250-fold more potent than prototypes 1 and 2, respectively. Tetraamines 9-11, bearing a rather rigid spacer between the nitrogen atoms instead of the very flexible polymethylene chain, displayed a profile similar to that of 1 at nicotinic receptors, whereas a significant decrease in potency was observed at muscarinic M-2 receptors. This finding may have relevance in understanding the mode of interaction with these receptors. Similarly, the constrained analogue 12 of methoctramine showed a decrease in potency at nicotinic and muscarinic M-2 receptors, revealing that the tricyclic system, which incorporates the 2-methoxybenzylamine moiety of 1, does not represent a good pharmacophore for activity at these sites. A most intriguing finding was the observation that the photolabile tetraamine 22 was more potent than methoctramine at nicotinic receptors and, what is more important, it inhibited a closed stale of the receptor.