Background Transcription in mammalian cells is a complex stochastic process involving shuttling of polymerase between genes and phase-separated liquid condensates. It occurs in bursts, which results in vastly different numbers of an mRNA species in isogenic cell populations. Several factors contributing to “transcriptional bursting” have been identified, usually classified as intrinsic, i.e., local to single genes, or extrinsic, relating to the macroscopic state of the cell. However, each factor only accounts partially for the observed phenomenon, and some possible contributors have not been explored yet. We focussed on processes at the 3’ and 5’ ends of a gene that enable reinitiation of transcription upon termination. Results Using Bayesian methodology, we measured the transcriptional bursting in inducible transgenes, showing that perturbation of polymerase shuttling typically reduces burst size, increases burst frequency, and thus limits transcriptional noise. Analysis based on paired-end tag sequencing (ChIA-PET) suggests that this effect is genome wide. The observed noise patterns are also reproduced by a generative model that captures major characteristics of the polymerase flux between a gene and a phase-separated compartment. Conclusions Interactions between the 3 ′ and 5 ′ ends of a gene, which facilitate polymerase recycling, are major contributors to transcriptional noise.

3’-5’ crosstalk contributes to transcriptional bursting / Cavallaro, Massimo; Walsh, Mark D.; Jones, Matt; Teahan, James; Tiberi, Simone; Finkenstädt, Bärbel; Hebenstreit, Daniel. - In: GENOME BIOLOGY. - ISSN 1474-760X. - ELETTRONICO. - 22:(2021), pp. 56.1-56.20. [10.1186/s13059-020-02227-5]

3’-5’ crosstalk contributes to transcriptional bursting

Tiberi, Simone;
2021

Abstract

Background Transcription in mammalian cells is a complex stochastic process involving shuttling of polymerase between genes and phase-separated liquid condensates. It occurs in bursts, which results in vastly different numbers of an mRNA species in isogenic cell populations. Several factors contributing to “transcriptional bursting” have been identified, usually classified as intrinsic, i.e., local to single genes, or extrinsic, relating to the macroscopic state of the cell. However, each factor only accounts partially for the observed phenomenon, and some possible contributors have not been explored yet. We focussed on processes at the 3’ and 5’ ends of a gene that enable reinitiation of transcription upon termination. Results Using Bayesian methodology, we measured the transcriptional bursting in inducible transgenes, showing that perturbation of polymerase shuttling typically reduces burst size, increases burst frequency, and thus limits transcriptional noise. Analysis based on paired-end tag sequencing (ChIA-PET) suggests that this effect is genome wide. The observed noise patterns are also reproduced by a generative model that captures major characteristics of the polymerase flux between a gene and a phase-separated compartment. Conclusions Interactions between the 3 ′ and 5 ′ ends of a gene, which facilitate polymerase recycling, are major contributors to transcriptional noise.
2021
3’-5’ crosstalk contributes to transcriptional bursting / Cavallaro, Massimo; Walsh, Mark D.; Jones, Matt; Teahan, James; Tiberi, Simone; Finkenstädt, Bärbel; Hebenstreit, Daniel. - In: GENOME BIOLOGY. - ISSN 1474-760X. - ELETTRONICO. - 22:(2021), pp. 56.1-56.20. [10.1186/s13059-020-02227-5]
Cavallaro, Massimo; Walsh, Mark D.; Jones, Matt; Teahan, James; Tiberi, Simone; Finkenstädt, Bärbel; Hebenstreit, Daniel
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Genome Biology - 2021 - Cavallaro.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipo: Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione (CCBY)
Dimensione 3.03 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
3.03 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/906902
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 9
  • Scopus 8
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 8
social impact