Aim. The main objective of this study is to evaluate under endoscopic vision the eventual presence of submucosal residual prosthetic cement (CE) in peri-implant disease cases. The correlation between the pathological condition and the apical position of CE has been also investigated. Methods. Forty-six patients with clinical and/or radiographic signs of peri- implant disease (mucositis or peri-implantitis) were included. All patients had a definitive cemented prosthesis loaded for at least 3 months. Patients with mucositis were treated with gentle debridement and re-evaluated at one month; if mucositis was resolved the patient was not included in the study. All enrolled patients underwent to endoscopic analysis (DV2 Perioscope) at the implant site, to identify eventual submucosal CE. The proximity of CE to implant platform was measured by means of a periodontal probe (PCP UNC-15) under endoscopic vision. Results. CE was detected in 37 out of 46 implants (80.4%) and were mainly located at vestibular and lingual or palatal areas. The most apical portion of the CE was located at 1.80mm from the edge of the implant platform. This distance was lower for implants with a diagnosis of peri-implantitis (1.11mm) than in sites with mucositis (2.21mm) (p=0.001). Conclusion. The presence of CE was strongly associated with peri-implant disease. The proximity of CE to implant platform was correlated to the severity of peri-implant disease.
Montevecchi M, V.L. (2022). PERI-IMPLANT CONDITION AND PROSTHETIC RESIDUAL CEMENT: AN ENDOSCOPICAL EVALUATION. DENTAL CADMOS, 90(6), 105-105 [10.19256/abstract.cduo.06.2022].
PERI-IMPLANT CONDITION AND PROSTHETIC RESIDUAL CEMENT: AN ENDOSCOPICAL EVALUATION
Montevecchi M
Primo
Conceptualization
;Valeriani LSecondo
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
;Stefanini MPenultimo
Writing – Review & Editing
;Zucchelli GUltimo
Supervision
2022
Abstract
Aim. The main objective of this study is to evaluate under endoscopic vision the eventual presence of submucosal residual prosthetic cement (CE) in peri-implant disease cases. The correlation between the pathological condition and the apical position of CE has been also investigated. Methods. Forty-six patients with clinical and/or radiographic signs of peri- implant disease (mucositis or peri-implantitis) were included. All patients had a definitive cemented prosthesis loaded for at least 3 months. Patients with mucositis were treated with gentle debridement and re-evaluated at one month; if mucositis was resolved the patient was not included in the study. All enrolled patients underwent to endoscopic analysis (DV2 Perioscope) at the implant site, to identify eventual submucosal CE. The proximity of CE to implant platform was measured by means of a periodontal probe (PCP UNC-15) under endoscopic vision. Results. CE was detected in 37 out of 46 implants (80.4%) and were mainly located at vestibular and lingual or palatal areas. The most apical portion of the CE was located at 1.80mm from the edge of the implant platform. This distance was lower for implants with a diagnosis of peri-implantitis (1.11mm) than in sites with mucositis (2.21mm) (p=0.001). Conclusion. The presence of CE was strongly associated with peri-implant disease. The proximity of CE to implant platform was correlated to the severity of peri-implant disease.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.