Wind shields and porous barriers are often positioned on bridge decks as ancillary structures. While being irrelevant from the structural point of view, it is well-known that their presence can deeply affect the deck aerodynamic performance. In particular, not only do they generally lead to an increase of the drag force, but also they modify the overall flow arrangement, so affecting all aerodynamic coefficients. In this paper, the numerical simulation of porous elements positioned on bridge sections is addressed following two approaches: in the first one, the pores are explicitly modeled, while in the second one a more convenient pressure-jump approach is adopted. In particular, the second approach has strong advantages compared to the first one, especially when simulations are used for optimization. The results obtained using these approaches are compared with each other and experimental measurements, highlighting strengths and limitations of both methodologies.

Simulation strategies for wind shields and porous barriers for bridge deck optimization / Mao Xu, Luca Patruno, Yuan-Lung Lo, Stefano de Miranda. - In: STRUCTURES. - ISSN 2352-0124. - ELETTRONICO. - 40:(2022), pp. 824-839. [10.1016/j.istruc.2022.04.044]

Simulation strategies for wind shields and porous barriers for bridge deck optimization

Mao Xu;Luca Patruno
;
Stefano de Miranda
2022

Abstract

Wind shields and porous barriers are often positioned on bridge decks as ancillary structures. While being irrelevant from the structural point of view, it is well-known that their presence can deeply affect the deck aerodynamic performance. In particular, not only do they generally lead to an increase of the drag force, but also they modify the overall flow arrangement, so affecting all aerodynamic coefficients. In this paper, the numerical simulation of porous elements positioned on bridge sections is addressed following two approaches: in the first one, the pores are explicitly modeled, while in the second one a more convenient pressure-jump approach is adopted. In particular, the second approach has strong advantages compared to the first one, especially when simulations are used for optimization. The results obtained using these approaches are compared with each other and experimental measurements, highlighting strengths and limitations of both methodologies.
2022
Simulation strategies for wind shields and porous barriers for bridge deck optimization / Mao Xu, Luca Patruno, Yuan-Lung Lo, Stefano de Miranda. - In: STRUCTURES. - ISSN 2352-0124. - ELETTRONICO. - 40:(2022), pp. 824-839. [10.1016/j.istruc.2022.04.044]
Mao Xu, Luca Patruno, Yuan-Lung Lo, Stefano de Miranda
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/897452
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact