Starting from the complex vision of critical studies in children’s literature, the contribution examines the issue of “difficult themes” in children’s books. As it has often emerged during many training experiences with figures involved in the educational relationship - such as educators, teachers, librarians, artists, etc. - these themes are considered difficult by adults, who often react with resistance and refusal. The expression “difficult themes” is used to summarise the variety of experiences that could be lived facing death, fear, pain, abandonment: adults often prefer to escape and deny, subtracting meaning and deepness from stories that otherwise would be capable of recounting the sphere of the negativity of existence. Indeed, the best children’s literature, historically, assigns to the narrative word the subversive possibility to bring the young readers closer to those painful themes. The contribution explores this strong contradiction through the analysis of the text as a metaphorical narration that creates plastic, yet tolerable images, even of painful experiences. The process of muting the words needed to talk about “difficult themes” demands a reflection on the quality of the relationship between childhood and adults, while children’s literature expresses the symptoms of deep-rooted uncertainties about who children really are.

Formazione in letteratura per l’infanzia e “temi difficili”. La parola metaforica e la complessità letteraria.

Milena Bernardi
2022

Abstract

Starting from the complex vision of critical studies in children’s literature, the contribution examines the issue of “difficult themes” in children’s books. As it has often emerged during many training experiences with figures involved in the educational relationship - such as educators, teachers, librarians, artists, etc. - these themes are considered difficult by adults, who often react with resistance and refusal. The expression “difficult themes” is used to summarise the variety of experiences that could be lived facing death, fear, pain, abandonment: adults often prefer to escape and deny, subtracting meaning and deepness from stories that otherwise would be capable of recounting the sphere of the negativity of existence. Indeed, the best children’s literature, historically, assigns to the narrative word the subversive possibility to bring the young readers closer to those painful themes. The contribution explores this strong contradiction through the analysis of the text as a metaphorical narration that creates plastic, yet tolerable images, even of painful experiences. The process of muting the words needed to talk about “difficult themes” demands a reflection on the quality of the relationship between childhood and adults, while children’s literature expresses the symptoms of deep-rooted uncertainties about who children really are.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
13513-Article Text-23995-1-10-20220720.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Articolo in rivista in versione editoriale online
Tipo: Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione (CCBY)
Dimensione 495.31 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
495.31 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/893777
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact