The case note analyzes the recent decision n. 8/2022 of the Italian Constitutional Court concerning a law-decree that modified the crime of abuse of office. The Court itself investigates the existence of the conditions of necessity and urgency to declare the questions of constitutionality unfounded. The Author argues that demanding the government to justify law- decree’s conditions would be a better way, or maybe the only way, to detect futures cases of violation of art. 77 of the Constitution
Caterina Domenicali (2022). A chi spetta l’onere di motivare i presupposti del decreto-legge? Riflessioni sulla sent. n. 8 del 2022 della Corte costituzionale. OSSERVATORIO COSTITUZIONALE, 3, 228-241.
A chi spetta l’onere di motivare i presupposti del decreto-legge? Riflessioni sulla sent. n. 8 del 2022 della Corte costituzionale
Caterina Domenicali
2022
Abstract
The case note analyzes the recent decision n. 8/2022 of the Italian Constitutional Court concerning a law-decree that modified the crime of abuse of office. The Court itself investigates the existence of the conditions of necessity and urgency to declare the questions of constitutionality unfounded. The Author argues that demanding the government to justify law- decree’s conditions would be a better way, or maybe the only way, to detect futures cases of violation of art. 77 of the ConstitutionFile | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
2022_3_13_Domenicali.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipo:
Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza:
Licenza per accesso libero gratuito
Dimensione
316.64 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
316.64 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.