The paper argues against what I call the “Fregean interpretation” of Peirce’s distinction between the immediate and the dynamic object of a sign, according to which Peirce’s dynamic object is akin to Frege’s Bedeutung, while Peirce’s immediate object is akin to Frege’s Sinn. After having exposed the Fregean interpretation, I briefly reconstruct the genesis of Peirce’s notion of immediate object in his semiotic writings of the years 1904–1909 and defend the view that, according to Peirce, only propositions have immediate objects.
Exploring Peirce’s speculative grammar: The immediate object of a sign / Bellucci F.. - In: SIGN SYSTEMS STUDIES. - ISSN 1406-4243. - ELETTRONICO. - 43:4(2015), pp. 399-415. [10.12697/SSS.2015.43.4.02]
Exploring Peirce’s speculative grammar: The immediate object of a sign
Bellucci F.
2015
Abstract
The paper argues against what I call the “Fregean interpretation” of Peirce’s distinction between the immediate and the dynamic object of a sign, according to which Peirce’s dynamic object is akin to Frege’s Bedeutung, while Peirce’s immediate object is akin to Frege’s Sinn. After having exposed the Fregean interpretation, I briefly reconstruct the genesis of Peirce’s notion of immediate object in his semiotic writings of the years 1904–1909 and defend the view that, according to Peirce, only propositions have immediate objects.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Exploring Peirce’s speculative grammar The immediate object of a sign_Francesco Bellucci.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipo:
Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza:
Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate (CCBYNCND)
Dimensione
217.57 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
217.57 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.