In recent years, 2D convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have been extensively used to diagnose neurological diseases from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data due to their potential to discern subtle and intricate patterns. Despite the high performances reported in numerous studies, developing CNN models with good generalization abilities is still a challenging task due to possible data leakage introduced during cross-validation (CV). In this study, we quantitatively assessed the effect of a data leakage caused by 3D MRI data splitting based on a 2D slice-level using three 2D CNN models to classify patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and Parkinson’s disease (PD). Our experiments showed that slice-level CV erroneously boosted the average slice level accuracy on the test set by 30% on Open Access Series of Imaging Studies (OASIS), 29% on Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI), 48% on Parkinson’s Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI) and 55% on a local de-novo PD Versilia dataset. Further tests on a randomly labeled OASIS-derived dataset produced about 96% of (erroneous) accuracy (slice-level split) and 50% accuracy (subject-level split), as expected from a randomized experiment. Overall, the extent of the effect of an erroneous slice-based CV is severe, especially for small datasets.

Yagis E., Atnafu S.W., Garcia Seco de Herrera A., Marzi C., Scheda R., Giannelli M., et al. (2021). Effect of data leakage in brain MRI classification using 2D convolutional neural networks. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 11(1), 1-13 [10.1038/s41598-021-01681-w].

Effect of data leakage in brain MRI classification using 2D convolutional neural networks

Atnafu S. W.;Marzi C.;Scheda R.;Diciotti S.
2021

Abstract

In recent years, 2D convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have been extensively used to diagnose neurological diseases from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data due to their potential to discern subtle and intricate patterns. Despite the high performances reported in numerous studies, developing CNN models with good generalization abilities is still a challenging task due to possible data leakage introduced during cross-validation (CV). In this study, we quantitatively assessed the effect of a data leakage caused by 3D MRI data splitting based on a 2D slice-level using three 2D CNN models to classify patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and Parkinson’s disease (PD). Our experiments showed that slice-level CV erroneously boosted the average slice level accuracy on the test set by 30% on Open Access Series of Imaging Studies (OASIS), 29% on Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI), 48% on Parkinson’s Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI) and 55% on a local de-novo PD Versilia dataset. Further tests on a randomly labeled OASIS-derived dataset produced about 96% of (erroneous) accuracy (slice-level split) and 50% accuracy (subject-level split), as expected from a randomized experiment. Overall, the extent of the effect of an erroneous slice-based CV is severe, especially for small datasets.
2021
Yagis E., Atnafu S.W., Garcia Seco de Herrera A., Marzi C., Scheda R., Giannelli M., et al. (2021). Effect of data leakage in brain MRI classification using 2D convolutional neural networks. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 11(1), 1-13 [10.1038/s41598-021-01681-w].
Yagis E.; Atnafu S.W.; Garcia Seco de Herrera A.; Marzi C.; Scheda R.; Giannelli M.; Tessa C.; Citi L.; Diciotti S.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
yagis21.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipo: Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 2.16 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.16 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
41598_2021_1681_MOESM1_ESM.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipo: File Supplementare
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione (CCBY)
Dimensione 870.61 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
870.61 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/872110
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 14
  • Scopus 47
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 41
social impact