The process of land planning, addressed to operate the synthesis between development aims and appropriate policies of preservation and management of territorial resources, requires detailed analysis of the territory. Generally this analysis is carried out on the whole area of interest by making use of data stored in Geographic Information Systems (GIS), but a detailed analysis of changes in the landscape can be carried out only on a sample of the whole territory. A very efficient sample design is the adaptive sequential procedure with permanent random numbers (ASPRN) proposed by Carfagna and Marzialetti (2009). However, ASPRN obliges the environmental engineer to jump from one side to another of the study area. Carfagna (2007) proposed a two-steps selection procedure with permanent random numbers (TSPRN) which allows to overcome the operational drawbacks of the ASPRN. In this paper we apply both procedures to a study area, in order to compare them from an operational viewpoint and to set up a methodology which enables an efficient estimate of the change of main landscape features on large areas.
Efficient statistical sample designs in a GIS for monitoring the landscape changes
CARFAGNA, ELISABETTA;TASSINARI, PATRIZIA;ZAGORAIOU, MAROUSSA;BENNI, STEFANO;TORREGGIANI, DANIELE
2009
Abstract
The process of land planning, addressed to operate the synthesis between development aims and appropriate policies of preservation and management of territorial resources, requires detailed analysis of the territory. Generally this analysis is carried out on the whole area of interest by making use of data stored in Geographic Information Systems (GIS), but a detailed analysis of changes in the landscape can be carried out only on a sample of the whole territory. A very efficient sample design is the adaptive sequential procedure with permanent random numbers (ASPRN) proposed by Carfagna and Marzialetti (2009). However, ASPRN obliges the environmental engineer to jump from one side to another of the study area. Carfagna (2007) proposed a two-steps selection procedure with permanent random numbers (TSPRN) which allows to overcome the operational drawbacks of the ASPRN. In this paper we apply both procedures to a study area, in order to compare them from an operational viewpoint and to set up a methodology which enables an efficient estimate of the change of main landscape features on large areas.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
