No consensus exists on how to model human articulations within musculoskeletal models (MSKM). We propose to evaluate a joint model based on their anatomical consistency (AC), i.e. by quantifying ligament and cartilage deformation associated to its motion: to be consistent with articular physiology this deformation should be minimum. We compared AC of three ankle joint models with increasing personalisation and showed that a higher personalisation better complies with the expected physiological behaviour.

Michele Conconi, E.M. (2021). Musculoskeletal Modelling: relevance of model anatomical consistency.

Musculoskeletal Modelling: relevance of model anatomical consistency

Michele Conconi;Nicola Sancisi;
2021

Abstract

No consensus exists on how to model human articulations within musculoskeletal models (MSKM). We propose to evaluate a joint model based on their anatomical consistency (AC), i.e. by quantifying ligament and cartilage deformation associated to its motion: to be consistent with articular physiology this deformation should be minimum. We compared AC of three ankle joint models with increasing personalisation and showed that a higher personalisation better complies with the expected physiological behaviour.
2021
XXVIII Congress of the International Society of Biomechanics
PC004
PC004
Michele Conconi, E.M. (2021). Musculoskeletal Modelling: relevance of model anatomical consistency.
Michele Conconi, Erica Montefiori, Nicola Sancisi, Claudia Mazzà
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/870522
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact