Background & aims: According to the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system, monofocal hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is classified as early (BCLC A) irrespective of its size, even though controversies still exist regarding staging and treatment of large tumours. We aimed at evaluating the appropriate staging and treatment for large (>5 cm) monofocal (HCC). Methods: From the Italian Liver Cancer database, we selected 924 patients with small early monofocal HCC (2-5 cm; SEM-HCC), 163 patients with larger tumours (>5 cm; LEM-HCC) and 1048 intermediate stage patients (BCLC B). Results: LEM-HCC patients had a worse overall survival (OS) than SEM-HCC (31.0 vs 49.0 months; P < .0001), and this was confirmed at multivariate analysis (HR 1.63, 95% CI 1.29-2.05; P < .0001). The small difference in OS between LEM-HCC and BCLC B patients (31.0 vs 27.0 months; P = .03) disappeared in the multivariate model (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.77-1.25; P = .89). In all monofocal tumours, treatment was the strongest independent predictor of survival, with a progressively decreasing survival benefit moving from "curative" to "palliative" therapies. The survival of resected patients with LEM-HCC was significantly shorter than that of SEM-HCC (44.0 vs 78.0 months; P = .002), but liver resection provided the highest survival benefit in both groups compared to other treatments. Conclusions: Monofocal HCC larger than 5 cm should not be staged as BCLC A and either a different staging system or a different subgrouping of patients (e.g. BCLC AB) should be used. Liver resection, if feasible, remains the recommended treatment for all these patients

Monofocal hepatocellular carcinoma: How much does size matter?

Forgione, Antonella;Azzaroli, Francesco;Trevisani, Franco;Biselli, Maurizio;Caraceni, Paolo;Garuti, Francesca;Gramenzi, Annagiulia;Santi, Valentina;Granito, Alessandro;Muratori, Luca;Piscaglia, Fabio;Sansone, Vito;Tovoli, Francesco;Dajti, Elton;Marasco, Giovanni;Ravaioli, Federico;Golfieri, Rita;Mosconi, Cristina;Renzulli, Matteo;Facciorusso, Antonio;Bevilacqua, Vittoria;Borghi, Alberto;Conti, Fabio;Dall'Aglio, Anna Chiara;Ercolani, Giorgio;Bonaventura, Chiara Di;Gitto, Stefano;
2021

Abstract

Background & aims: According to the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system, monofocal hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is classified as early (BCLC A) irrespective of its size, even though controversies still exist regarding staging and treatment of large tumours. We aimed at evaluating the appropriate staging and treatment for large (>5 cm) monofocal (HCC). Methods: From the Italian Liver Cancer database, we selected 924 patients with small early monofocal HCC (2-5 cm; SEM-HCC), 163 patients with larger tumours (>5 cm; LEM-HCC) and 1048 intermediate stage patients (BCLC B). Results: LEM-HCC patients had a worse overall survival (OS) than SEM-HCC (31.0 vs 49.0 months; P < .0001), and this was confirmed at multivariate analysis (HR 1.63, 95% CI 1.29-2.05; P < .0001). The small difference in OS between LEM-HCC and BCLC B patients (31.0 vs 27.0 months; P = .03) disappeared in the multivariate model (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.77-1.25; P = .89). In all monofocal tumours, treatment was the strongest independent predictor of survival, with a progressively decreasing survival benefit moving from "curative" to "palliative" therapies. The survival of resected patients with LEM-HCC was significantly shorter than that of SEM-HCC (44.0 vs 78.0 months; P = .002), but liver resection provided the highest survival benefit in both groups compared to other treatments. Conclusions: Monofocal HCC larger than 5 cm should not be staged as BCLC A and either a different staging system or a different subgrouping of patients (e.g. BCLC AB) should be used. Liver resection, if feasible, remains the recommended treatment for all these patients
Pelizzaro, Filippo; Penzo, Barbara; Peserico, Giulia; Imondi, Angela; Sartori, Anna; Vitale, Alessandro; Cillo, Umberto; Giannini, Edoardo G.; Forgione, Antonella; Ludovico Rapaccini, Gian; Di Marco, Maria; Caturelli, Eugenio; Zoli, Marco; Sacco, Rodolfo; Cabibbo, Giuseppe; Marra, Fabio; Mega, Andrea; Morisco, Filomena; Gasbarrini, Antonio; Svegliati‐Baroni, Gianluca; Giuseppe Foschi, Francesco; Olivani, Andrea; Masotto, Alberto; Nardone, Gerardo; Raimondo, Giovanni; Azzaroli, Francesco; Vidili, Gianpaolo; Oliveri, Filippo; Trevisani, Franco; Farinati, Fabio; Biselli, Maurizio; Caraceni, Paolo; Garuti, Francesca; Gramenzi, Annagiulia; Neri, Andrea; Santi, Valentina; Granito, Alessandro; Muratori, Luca; Piscaglia, Fabio; Sansone, Vito; Tovoli, Francesco; Dajti, Elton; Marasco, Giovanni; Ravaioli, Federico; Cappelli, Alberta; Golfieri, Rita; Mosconi, Cristina; Renzulli, Matteo; Sammarco, Ambra; Cela, Ester Marina; Facciorusso, Antonio; Cacciato, Valentina; Casagrande, Edoardo; Moscatelli, Alessandro; Pellegatta, Gaia; de Matthaeis, Nicoletta; Allegrini, Gloria; Lauria, Valentina; Ghittoni, Giorgia; Pelecca, Giorgio; Chegai, Fabrizio; Coratella, Fabio; Ortenzi, Mariano; Missale, Gabriele; Inno, Alessandro; Marchetti, Fabiana; Busacca, Anita; Cabibbo, Giuseppe; Cammà, Calogero; Martino, Vincenzo Di; Emanuele Maria Rizzo, Giacomo; Franzè, Maria Stella; Saitta, Carlo; Sauchella, Assunta; Bevilacqua, Vittoria; Borghi, Alberto; Casadei Gardini, Andrea; Conti, Fabio; Dall'Aglio, Anna Chiara; Ercolani, Giorgio; Mirici, Federica; Campani, Claudia; Bonaventura, Chiara Di; Gitto, Stefano; Coccoli, Pietro; Malerba, Antonio; Guarino, Maria; Brunetto, Maurizia; Romagnoli, Veronica
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/11585/800061
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 5
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 5
social impact