This introduction has two aims. The first is to defend the view that with “sign” Peirce very often simply means “proposition”. This is a very unorthodox view, and its defense will inevitably be impressionistic and incomplete, but not, I think, to the point of being misleading. If I am correct in this view, then a massive reconsideration of Peirce’s theory of signs is urgently needed. The second aim is to offer an overview over the papers that compose this issue of Blityri.
Introduzione / Francesco Bellucci. - In: BLITYRI. - ISSN 2281-6682. - STAMPA. - 9:2(2020), pp. 7-20.
Introduzione
Francesco Bellucci
2020
Abstract
This introduction has two aims. The first is to defend the view that with “sign” Peirce very often simply means “proposition”. This is a very unorthodox view, and its defense will inevitably be impressionistic and incomplete, but not, I think, to the point of being misleading. If I am correct in this view, then a massive reconsideration of Peirce’s theory of signs is urgently needed. The second aim is to offer an overview over the papers that compose this issue of Blityri.File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
