This introduction has two aims. The first is to defend the view that with “sign” Peirce very often simply means “proposition”. This is a very unorthodox view, and its defense will inevitably be impressionistic and incomplete, but not, I think, to the point of being misleading. If I am correct in this view, then a massive reconsideration of Peirce’s theory of signs is urgently needed. The second aim is to offer an overview over the papers that compose this issue of Blityri.
Francesco Bellucci (2020). Introduzione. BLITYRI, 9(2), 7-20.
Introduzione
Francesco Bellucci
2020
Abstract
This introduction has two aims. The first is to defend the view that with “sign” Peirce very often simply means “proposition”. This is a very unorthodox view, and its defense will inevitably be impressionistic and incomplete, but not, I think, to the point of being misleading. If I am correct in this view, then a massive reconsideration of Peirce’s theory of signs is urgently needed. The second aim is to offer an overview over the papers that compose this issue of Blityri.File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
