An implicit assumption in standard musculoskeletal model (MSKM) is that joint constraints, i.e. ligament and contact forces (CFs), do not contribute to the equilibrium of the joint. To be consistent with this assumption, ligament elongation and cartilage co-penetration should be small enough to produce negligible deformation work [1]. In this study, three ankle joint models with increasing level of personalization are compared within a (MSKM) of the lower limb, integrated with individual ligaments and articular surfaces from magnetic resonance images (MRI) to assess their anatomical consistency
From scaling to MRI defined subject-specific ankle joint models: a comparison of three approaches with increasing level of anatomical consistency
Michele Conconi;Nicola Sancisi;
2019
Abstract
An implicit assumption in standard musculoskeletal model (MSKM) is that joint constraints, i.e. ligament and contact forces (CFs), do not contribute to the equilibrium of the joint. To be consistent with this assumption, ligament elongation and cartilage co-penetration should be small enough to produce negligible deformation work [1]. In this study, three ankle joint models with increasing level of personalization are compared within a (MSKM) of the lower limb, integrated with individual ligaments and articular surfaces from magnetic resonance images (MRI) to assess their anatomical consistencyFile in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
