Sacrificial moral dilemmas elicit a strong conflict between the motive to not personally harm someone and the competing motive to achieving the greater good, which is often described as the “utilitarian” response. Some prior research suggests that reasoning abilities and deliberative cognitive style are associated with endorsement of utilitarian solutions, but, as has more recently been emphasized, both conceptual and methodological issues leave open the possibility that utilitarian responses are due instead to a reduced emotional response to harm. Across 8 studies, using self-report, behavioral performance, and neuroanatomical measures, we show that individual differences in reasoning ability and cognitive style of thinking are positively associated with a preference for utilitarian solutions, but bear no relationship to harm-relevant concerns. These findings support the dual-process model of moral decision making and highlight the utility of process dissociation methods

Reasoning supports utilitarian resolutions to moral dilemmas across diverse measures / Indrajeet Patil, Micaela Maria Zucchelli, Wouter Kool, Stephanie Campbell, Federico Fornasier, Marta Calò, Giorgia Silani, Mina Cikara, Fiery Cushman. - In: JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY. - ISSN 0022-3514. - ELETTRONICO. - 120:2(2021), pp. 443-460. [10.1037/pspp0000281]

Reasoning supports utilitarian resolutions to moral dilemmas across diverse measures

Micaela Maria Zucchelli
;
Giorgia Silani;
2021

Abstract

Sacrificial moral dilemmas elicit a strong conflict between the motive to not personally harm someone and the competing motive to achieving the greater good, which is often described as the “utilitarian” response. Some prior research suggests that reasoning abilities and deliberative cognitive style are associated with endorsement of utilitarian solutions, but, as has more recently been emphasized, both conceptual and methodological issues leave open the possibility that utilitarian responses are due instead to a reduced emotional response to harm. Across 8 studies, using self-report, behavioral performance, and neuroanatomical measures, we show that individual differences in reasoning ability and cognitive style of thinking are positively associated with a preference for utilitarian solutions, but bear no relationship to harm-relevant concerns. These findings support the dual-process model of moral decision making and highlight the utility of process dissociation methods
2021
Reasoning supports utilitarian resolutions to moral dilemmas across diverse measures / Indrajeet Patil, Micaela Maria Zucchelli, Wouter Kool, Stephanie Campbell, Federico Fornasier, Marta Calò, Giorgia Silani, Mina Cikara, Fiery Cushman. - In: JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY. - ISSN 0022-3514. - ELETTRONICO. - 120:2(2021), pp. 443-460. [10.1037/pspp0000281]
Indrajeet Patil, Micaela Maria Zucchelli, Wouter Kool, Stephanie Campbell, Federico Fornasier, Marta Calò, Giorgia Silani, Mina Cikara, Fiery Cushman
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/718830
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 54
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 50
social impact