Epidemiology and health economics have systemic interdependencies. The identification of the economic outcomes of any disease is operated by overlapping its epidemiology with the economic functions of the impacted entities. This communication presents two epidemiologic-economic models designed to evaluate the economic burden of cystic echinococcosis and leishmaniasis in Veneto (Northeastern Italy). Following a One Health approach, the research integrates expertise from different disciplines and institutions and fulfilled its first stage by defining the relevant cost categories and the data collection strategy for the two diseases in the study area. The two models identify the relevant epidemiological factors and the economic outcomes of infections in both animals and humans. The results, visualized in flow charts indicating the types of costs associated with these zoonoses, will guide data collection and the epidemiologic and economic assessment in the next research stages. This experience shows that One Health methods, although still innovative or unusual in many scientific and professional contexts, can be applied by using relatively limited resources and already available professional skills.

Epidemiologic-economic models and the One Health paradigm: echinococcosis and leishmaniasis, case studies in Veneto region, Northeastern Italy / Massimo Canali, Maurizio Aragrande, Andrea Angheben, Gioia Capelli, Michele Drigo, Federico Gobbi, Francesca Tamarozzi, Rudi Cassini. - In: ONE HEALTH. - ISSN 2352-7714. - ELETTRONICO. - 9:1(2020), pp. 100115.1-100115.6. [10.1016/j.onehlt.2019.100115]

Epidemiologic-economic models and the One Health paradigm: echinococcosis and leishmaniasis, case studies in Veneto region, Northeastern Italy

Massimo Canali
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
;
Maurizio Aragrande
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
;
2020

Abstract

Epidemiology and health economics have systemic interdependencies. The identification of the economic outcomes of any disease is operated by overlapping its epidemiology with the economic functions of the impacted entities. This communication presents two epidemiologic-economic models designed to evaluate the economic burden of cystic echinococcosis and leishmaniasis in Veneto (Northeastern Italy). Following a One Health approach, the research integrates expertise from different disciplines and institutions and fulfilled its first stage by defining the relevant cost categories and the data collection strategy for the two diseases in the study area. The two models identify the relevant epidemiological factors and the economic outcomes of infections in both animals and humans. The results, visualized in flow charts indicating the types of costs associated with these zoonoses, will guide data collection and the epidemiologic and economic assessment in the next research stages. This experience shows that One Health methods, although still innovative or unusual in many scientific and professional contexts, can be applied by using relatively limited resources and already available professional skills.
2020
Epidemiologic-economic models and the One Health paradigm: echinococcosis and leishmaniasis, case studies in Veneto region, Northeastern Italy / Massimo Canali, Maurizio Aragrande, Andrea Angheben, Gioia Capelli, Michele Drigo, Federico Gobbi, Francesca Tamarozzi, Rudi Cassini. - In: ONE HEALTH. - ISSN 2352-7714. - ELETTRONICO. - 9:1(2020), pp. 100115.1-100115.6. [10.1016/j.onehlt.2019.100115]
Massimo Canali, Maurizio Aragrande, Andrea Angheben, Gioia Capelli, Michele Drigo, Federico Gobbi, Francesca Tamarozzi, Rudi Cassini
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
1-s2.0-S2352771419300709-main (1).pdf

accesso aperto

Tipo: Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione (CCBY)
Dimensione 2.53 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.53 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/707717
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 8
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 4
social impact