Minimally Invasive Pyelolithotomy: Comparison of Robot-assisted and Laparoscopic Techniques.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the perioperative and short-term outcomes of robotic pyelolithotomy (RP) and laparoscopic pyelolithotomy (LP) for the treatment of renal stones. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 39 patients who underwent robotic or laparoscopic pyelolithotomy from January 2015 to December 2018. RESULTS: The preoperative characteristics of the two groups were comparable. The mean operative time was 173 ± 51 and 182 ± 62 min in the RP and LP groups, respectively (p=0.6). Blood loss and length of hospital stay with the robotic approach were lower than those with the laparoscopic approach (210 ± 180 ml vs. 639 ± 412 ml, p<0.001, and 3.8 ± 3 days vs. 7.3 ± 2.8 days, p=0.001). A complete stone-free status was achieved in 17 (85%) patients in the RP group and 8 (42%) in the LP group (p=0.01). Post-operative complications with the two approaches were also similar. CONCLUSIONS: In some selected cases, laparoscopic and robotic pyelolithotomy are alternative procedures for large, multiple and complex kidney stones. The robotic approach was associated with less intraoperative blood loss and fewer days of hospitalization compared to the laparoscopic method, and also gives a better stone-free rate.