Over the last years, courts are increasingly inclined to consider precontractual arrangements as binding contracts, endowing them with commitment value that can be used strategically by the party that proposes them. We study the optimal precontractual arrangement offers of an upstream monopolist producing an essential input that may sell to two vertically differentiated downstream firms. These arrangements concern the exclusivity and the contingency of the contracts to be signed. Once the precontractual arrangements have been determined, the terms of the contracts are negotiated between the upstream supplier and the downstream firm(s). The distribution of bargaining power during the contract terms negotiations is the main driving force of the monopolist's choices. A powerful supplier always opts for an exclusive contract. By contrast, a weaker supplier offers nonexclusive contracts and makes each of them contingent or noncontingent such as to guarantee the most favorable outside option in its negotiations.

Emanuele Bacchiega, O.B. (2018). Contract contingency in vertically related markets. JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS & MANAGEMENT STRATEGY, 27(4), 772-791 [10.1111/jems.12252].

Contract contingency in vertically related markets

Emanuele Bacchiega
;
2018

Abstract

Over the last years, courts are increasingly inclined to consider precontractual arrangements as binding contracts, endowing them with commitment value that can be used strategically by the party that proposes them. We study the optimal precontractual arrangement offers of an upstream monopolist producing an essential input that may sell to two vertically differentiated downstream firms. These arrangements concern the exclusivity and the contingency of the contracts to be signed. Once the precontractual arrangements have been determined, the terms of the contracts are negotiated between the upstream supplier and the downstream firm(s). The distribution of bargaining power during the contract terms negotiations is the main driving force of the monopolist's choices. A powerful supplier always opts for an exclusive contract. By contrast, a weaker supplier offers nonexclusive contracts and makes each of them contingent or noncontingent such as to guarantee the most favorable outside option in its negotiations.
2018
Emanuele Bacchiega, O.B. (2018). Contract contingency in vertically related markets. JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS & MANAGEMENT STRATEGY, 27(4), 772-791 [10.1111/jems.12252].
Emanuele Bacchiega, Olivier Bonroy, Emmanuel Petrakis
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Appendices_Not_For_Publi.pdf

Open Access dal 01/11/2020

Descrizione: Appendici online.
Tipo: Postprint
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale (CCBYNC)
Dimensione 242.18 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
242.18 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
bacchiega finale.pdf

Open Access dal 01/11/2020

Tipo: Postprint
Licenza: Licenza per accesso libero gratuito
Dimensione 5.05 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
5.05 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/647955
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 4
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 4
social impact