Somatosensory temporal discrimination threshold is often prolonged in patients with dystonia. Previous evidence suggested that this might be caused by impaired somatosensory processing in the time domain. Here, we tested if other markers of reduced inhibition in the somatosensory system might also contribute to abnormal somatosensory temporal discrimination in dystonia.

Antelmi, E., Erro, R., Rocchi, L., Liguori, R., Tinazzi, M., Di Stasio, F., et al. (2017). Neurophysiological correlates of abnormal somatosensory temporal discrimination in dystonia. MOVEMENT DISORDERS, 32(1), 141-148 [10.1002/mds.26804].

Neurophysiological correlates of abnormal somatosensory temporal discrimination in dystonia

ANTELMI, ELENA;ROCCHI, LORENZO;LIGUORI, ROCCO;
2017

Abstract

Somatosensory temporal discrimination threshold is often prolonged in patients with dystonia. Previous evidence suggested that this might be caused by impaired somatosensory processing in the time domain. Here, we tested if other markers of reduced inhibition in the somatosensory system might also contribute to abnormal somatosensory temporal discrimination in dystonia.
2017
Antelmi, E., Erro, R., Rocchi, L., Liguori, R., Tinazzi, M., Di Stasio, F., et al. (2017). Neurophysiological correlates of abnormal somatosensory temporal discrimination in dystonia. MOVEMENT DISORDERS, 32(1), 141-148 [10.1002/mds.26804].
Antelmi, Elena; Erro, Roberto; Rocchi, Lorenzo; Liguori, Rocco; Tinazzi, Michele; Di Stasio, Flavio; Berardelli, Alfredo; Rothwell, John C; Bhatia, Ka...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/585793
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 25
  • Scopus 65
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 58
social impact