OBJECTIVE: In patients suffering multiple sclerosis activity despite treatment with interferon ?? or glatiramer acetate, clinicians often switch therapy to either natalizumab or fingolimod. However, no studies have directly compared the outcomes of switching to either of these agents. METHODS: Using MSBase, a large international, observational, prospectively acquired cohort study, we identified patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis experiencing relapses or disability progression within the 6 months immediately preceding switch to either natalizumab or fingolimod. Quasi-randomization with propensity score-based matching was used to select subpopulations with comparable baseline characteristics. Relapse and disability outcomes were compared in paired, pairwise-censored analyses. RESULTS: Of the 792 included patients, 578 patients were matched (natalizumab, n???=???407; fingolimod, n???=???171). Mean on-study follow-up was 12 months. The annualized relapse rates decreased from 1.5 to 0.2 on natalizumab and from 1.3 to 0.4 on fingolimod, with 50% relative postswitch difference in relapse hazard (p???=???0.002). A 2.8 times higher rate of sustained disability regression was observed after the switch to natalizumab in comparison to fingolimod (p???

Kalincik T, Horakova D, Spelman T, Jokubaitis V, Trojano M, Lugaresi A, et al. (2015). Switch to natalizumab vs fingolimod in active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY, 77(3), 425-435 [10.1002/ana.24339].

Switch to natalizumab vs fingolimod in active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.

LUGARESI, ALESSANDRA;
2015

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In patients suffering multiple sclerosis activity despite treatment with interferon ?? or glatiramer acetate, clinicians often switch therapy to either natalizumab or fingolimod. However, no studies have directly compared the outcomes of switching to either of these agents. METHODS: Using MSBase, a large international, observational, prospectively acquired cohort study, we identified patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis experiencing relapses or disability progression within the 6 months immediately preceding switch to either natalizumab or fingolimod. Quasi-randomization with propensity score-based matching was used to select subpopulations with comparable baseline characteristics. Relapse and disability outcomes were compared in paired, pairwise-censored analyses. RESULTS: Of the 792 included patients, 578 patients were matched (natalizumab, n???=???407; fingolimod, n???=???171). Mean on-study follow-up was 12 months. The annualized relapse rates decreased from 1.5 to 0.2 on natalizumab and from 1.3 to 0.4 on fingolimod, with 50% relative postswitch difference in relapse hazard (p???=???0.002). A 2.8 times higher rate of sustained disability regression was observed after the switch to natalizumab in comparison to fingolimod (p???
2015
Kalincik T, Horakova D, Spelman T, Jokubaitis V, Trojano M, Lugaresi A, et al. (2015). Switch to natalizumab vs fingolimod in active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY, 77(3), 425-435 [10.1002/ana.24339].
Kalincik T; Horakova D; Spelman T; Jokubaitis V; Trojano M; Lugaresi A; Izquierdo G; Rozsa C; Grammond P; Alroughani R; Duquette P; Girard M; Pucci E;...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
ana24339-sup-0001-suppinfo.docx

accesso aperto

Tipo: File Supplementare
Licenza: Licenza per accesso libero gratuito
Dimensione 31.86 kB
Formato Microsoft Word XML
31.86 kB Microsoft Word XML Visualizza/Apri
annalsneur_2015_AM.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipo: Postprint / Author's Accepted Manuscript (AAM) - versione accettata per la pubblicazione dopo la peer-review
Licenza: Licenza per accesso libero gratuito
Dimensione 1.32 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.32 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/546648
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 41
  • Scopus 145
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 140
social impact