In the contemporary debate over the theological fatalism and the compatibilism between divine foreknowledge and free will, an important role is that of the so-called «Neo-ockhamist» solution. The historical reference, often read under a contemporary lens that ends up deforming it, is the argument of William of Ockham. This article focuses on the resumption of his position in the contemporary debate of philosophy of religion, in the Anglo-Saxon world, through the work of Alvin Plantinga.
Riccardo Fedriga, Roberto Limonta (2015). Usi e interpretazioni contemporanee dell’ockhamismo Libertà del volere e fatalismo teologico in Alvin Plantinga. RIVISTA DI FILOSOFIA, CVI(3), 391-412.
Usi e interpretazioni contemporanee dell’ockhamismo Libertà del volere e fatalismo teologico in Alvin Plantinga
FEDRIGA, RICCARDO;
2015
Abstract
In the contemporary debate over the theological fatalism and the compatibilism between divine foreknowledge and free will, an important role is that of the so-called «Neo-ockhamist» solution. The historical reference, often read under a contemporary lens that ends up deforming it, is the argument of William of Ockham. This article focuses on the resumption of his position in the contemporary debate of philosophy of religion, in the Anglo-Saxon world, through the work of Alvin Plantinga.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.