According to Roman Jakobson, Charles S. Peirce was a forerun- ner of structuralism. Jakobson credited Peirce with the idea of the priority of form over matter and of the whole over its parts; fur- ther, for Jakobson Peirce developed a theory of oppositive rela- tions. The aim of this paper is to show that this view is misleading. It will be shown that Peirce’s logic of relatives, his doctrine of the composition of relative concepts (rhemata) and his conception of continuous predicate or relation of representation are by no means reducible to the standard structuralist approach.

Peirce's Chemistry of Concepts

BELLUCCI, FRANCESCO
2012

Abstract

According to Roman Jakobson, Charles S. Peirce was a forerun- ner of structuralism. Jakobson credited Peirce with the idea of the priority of form over matter and of the whole over its parts; fur- ther, for Jakobson Peirce developed a theory of oppositive rela- tions. The aim of this paper is to show that this view is misleading. It will be shown that Peirce’s logic of relatives, his doctrine of the composition of relative concepts (rhemata) and his conception of continuous predicate or relation of representation are by no means reducible to the standard structuralist approach.
2012
VS
Francesco Bellucci
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/359716
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact