Hadronic event shape distributions from e+e− annihilation measured by the OPAL experiment at centre-of-mass energies between 91 GeV and 209 GeV are used to determine the strong coupling αS. The results are based on QCD predictions complete to the next-to-next-to-leading order (NNLO), and on NNLO calculations matched to the resummed next-to-leading-log-approximation terms (NNLO + NLLA). The combined NNLO result from all variables and centre-of-mass energies is while the combined NNLO + NLLA result is The completeness of the NNLO and NNLO + NLLA results with respect to missing higher order contributions, studied by varying the renormalization scale, is improved compared to previous results based on NLO or NLO + NLLA predictions only. The observed energy dependence of αS agrees with the QCD prediction of asymptotic freedom and excludes the absence of running.

Determination of α S using OPAL hadronic event shapes at $\sqrt{s} = 91\mbox{--}209~\mathrm{GeV}$ and resummed NNLO calculations / G. Abbiendi;C. Ainsley;P. F. Åkesson;G. Alexander;G. Anagnostou;K. J. Anderson;S. Asai;D. Axen;I. Bailey;E. Barberio;T. Barillari;R. J. Barlow;R. J. Batley;P. Bechtle;T. Behnke;K. W. Bell;P. J. Bell;G. Bella;A. Bellerive;G. Benelli;S. Bethke;O. Biebel;O. Boeriu;P. Bock;M. Boutemeur;S. Braibant;R. M. Brown;H. J. Burckhart;S. Campana;P. Capiluppi;R. K. Carnegie;A. A. Carter;J. R. Carter;C. Y. Chang;D. G. Charlton;C. Ciocca;A. Csilling;M. Cuffiani;S. Dado;M. Dallavalle;A. Roeck;E. A. Wolf;K. Desch;B. Dienes;J. Dubbert;E. Duchovni;G. Duckeck;I. P. Duerdoth;E. Etzion;F. Fabbri;P. Ferrari;F. Fiedler;I. Fleck;M. Ford;A. Frey;P. Gagnon;J. W. Gary;C. Geich-Gimbel;G. Giacomelli;P. Giacomelli;M. Giunta;J. Goldberg;E. Gross;J. Grunhaus;M. Gruwé;A. Gupta;C. Hajdu;M. Hamann;G. G. Hanson;A. Harel;M. Hauschild;C. M. Hawkes;R. Hawkings;G. Herten;R. D. Heuer;J. C. Hill;D. Horváth;P. Igo-Kemenes;K. Ishii;H. Jeremie;P. Jovanovic;T. R. Junk;J. Kanzaki;D. Karlen;K. Kawagoe;T. Kawamoto;R. K. Keeler;R. G. Kellogg;B. W. Kennedy;S. Kluth;T. Kobayashi;M. Kobel;S. Komamiya;T. Krämer;A. Krasznahorkay;P. Krieger;J. Krogh;T. Kuhl;M. Kupper;G. D. Lafferty;H. Landsman;D. Lanske;D. Lellouch;J. Letts;L. Levinson;J. Lillich;S. L. Lloyd;F. K. Loebinger;J. Lu;A. Ludwig;J. Ludwig;W. Mader;S. Marcellini;A. J. Martin;T. Mashimo;P. Mättig;J. McKenna;R. A. McPherson;F. Meijers;W. Menges;F. S. Merritt;H. Mes;N. Meyer;A. Michelini;S. Mihara;G. Mikenberg;D. J. Miller;W. Mohr;T. Mori;A. Mutter;K. Nagai;I. Nakamura;H. Nanjo;H. A. Neal;S. W. O’Neale;A. Oh;M. J. Oreglia;S. Orito;C. Pahl;G. Pásztor;J. R. Pater;J. E. Pilcher;J. Pinfold;D. E. Plane;O. Pooth;M. Przybycień;A. Quadt;K. Rabbertz;C. Rembser;P. Renkel;J. M. Roney;A. M. Rossi;Y. Rozen;K. Runge;K. Sachs;T. Saeki;E. K. G. Sarkisyan;A. D. Schaile;O. Schaile;P. Scharff-Hansen;J. Schieck;T. Schörner-Sadenius;M. Schröder;M. Schumacher;R. Seuster;T. G. Shears;B. C. Shen;P. Sherwood;A. Skuja;A. M. Smith;R. Sobie;S. Söldner-Rembold;F. Spano;A. Stahl;D. Strom;R. Ströhmer;S. Tarem;M. Tasevsky;R. Teuscher;M. A. Thomson;E. Torrence;D. Toya;I. Trigger;Z. Trócsányi;E. Tsur;M. F. Turner-Watson;I. Ueda;B. Ujvári;C. F. Vollmer;P. Vannerem;R. Vértesi;M. Verzocchi;H. Voss;J. Vossebeld;C. P. Ward;D. R. Ward;P. M. Watkins;A. T. Watson;N. K. Watson;P. S. Wells;T. Wengler;N. Wermes;G. W. Wilson;J. A. Wilson;G. Wolf;T. R. Wyatt;S. Yamashita;D. Zer-Zion;L. Zivkovic. - In: THE EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL. C, PARTICLES AND FIELDS. - ISSN 1434-6044. - ELETTRONICO. - 71:(2011), pp. 1-21. [10.1140/epjc/s10052-011-1733-z]

Determination of α S using OPAL hadronic event shapes at $\sqrt{s} = 91\mbox{--}209~\mathrm{GeV}$ and resummed NNLO calculations

BRAIBANT, SYLVIE;CAPILUPPI, PAOLO;CIOCCA, CLAUDIA;CUFFIANI, MARCO;GIACOMELLI, GIORGIO MARIA;
2011

Abstract

Hadronic event shape distributions from e+e− annihilation measured by the OPAL experiment at centre-of-mass energies between 91 GeV and 209 GeV are used to determine the strong coupling αS. The results are based on QCD predictions complete to the next-to-next-to-leading order (NNLO), and on NNLO calculations matched to the resummed next-to-leading-log-approximation terms (NNLO + NLLA). The combined NNLO result from all variables and centre-of-mass energies is while the combined NNLO + NLLA result is The completeness of the NNLO and NNLO + NLLA results with respect to missing higher order contributions, studied by varying the renormalization scale, is improved compared to previous results based on NLO or NLO + NLLA predictions only. The observed energy dependence of αS agrees with the QCD prediction of asymptotic freedom and excludes the absence of running.
2011
Determination of α S using OPAL hadronic event shapes at $\sqrt{s} = 91\mbox{--}209~\mathrm{GeV}$ and resummed NNLO calculations / G. Abbiendi;C. Ainsley;P. F. Åkesson;G. Alexander;G. Anagnostou;K. J. Anderson;S. Asai;D. Axen;I. Bailey;E. Barberio;T. Barillari;R. J. Barlow;R. J. Batley;P. Bechtle;T. Behnke;K. W. Bell;P. J. Bell;G. Bella;A. Bellerive;G. Benelli;S. Bethke;O. Biebel;O. Boeriu;P. Bock;M. Boutemeur;S. Braibant;R. M. Brown;H. J. Burckhart;S. Campana;P. Capiluppi;R. K. Carnegie;A. A. Carter;J. R. Carter;C. Y. Chang;D. G. Charlton;C. Ciocca;A. Csilling;M. Cuffiani;S. Dado;M. Dallavalle;A. Roeck;E. A. Wolf;K. Desch;B. Dienes;J. Dubbert;E. Duchovni;G. Duckeck;I. P. Duerdoth;E. Etzion;F. Fabbri;P. Ferrari;F. Fiedler;I. Fleck;M. Ford;A. Frey;P. Gagnon;J. W. Gary;C. Geich-Gimbel;G. Giacomelli;P. Giacomelli;M. Giunta;J. Goldberg;E. Gross;J. Grunhaus;M. Gruwé;A. Gupta;C. Hajdu;M. Hamann;G. G. Hanson;A. Harel;M. Hauschild;C. M. Hawkes;R. Hawkings;G. Herten;R. D. Heuer;J. C. Hill;D. Horváth;P. Igo-Kemenes;K. Ishii;H. Jeremie;P. Jovanovic;T. R. Junk;J. Kanzaki;D. Karlen;K. Kawagoe;T. Kawamoto;R. K. Keeler;R. G. Kellogg;B. W. Kennedy;S. Kluth;T. Kobayashi;M. Kobel;S. Komamiya;T. Krämer;A. Krasznahorkay;P. Krieger;J. Krogh;T. Kuhl;M. Kupper;G. D. Lafferty;H. Landsman;D. Lanske;D. Lellouch;J. Letts;L. Levinson;J. Lillich;S. L. Lloyd;F. K. Loebinger;J. Lu;A. Ludwig;J. Ludwig;W. Mader;S. Marcellini;A. J. Martin;T. Mashimo;P. Mättig;J. McKenna;R. A. McPherson;F. Meijers;W. Menges;F. S. Merritt;H. Mes;N. Meyer;A. Michelini;S. Mihara;G. Mikenberg;D. J. Miller;W. Mohr;T. Mori;A. Mutter;K. Nagai;I. Nakamura;H. Nanjo;H. A. Neal;S. W. O’Neale;A. Oh;M. J. Oreglia;S. Orito;C. Pahl;G. Pásztor;J. R. Pater;J. E. Pilcher;J. Pinfold;D. E. Plane;O. Pooth;M. Przybycień;A. Quadt;K. Rabbertz;C. Rembser;P. Renkel;J. M. Roney;A. M. Rossi;Y. Rozen;K. Runge;K. Sachs;T. Saeki;E. K. G. Sarkisyan;A. D. Schaile;O. Schaile;P. Scharff-Hansen;J. Schieck;T. Schörner-Sadenius;M. Schröder;M. Schumacher;R. Seuster;T. G. Shears;B. C. Shen;P. Sherwood;A. Skuja;A. M. Smith;R. Sobie;S. Söldner-Rembold;F. Spano;A. Stahl;D. Strom;R. Ströhmer;S. Tarem;M. Tasevsky;R. Teuscher;M. A. Thomson;E. Torrence;D. Toya;I. Trigger;Z. Trócsányi;E. Tsur;M. F. Turner-Watson;I. Ueda;B. Ujvári;C. F. Vollmer;P. Vannerem;R. Vértesi;M. Verzocchi;H. Voss;J. Vossebeld;C. P. Ward;D. R. Ward;P. M. Watkins;A. T. Watson;N. K. Watson;P. S. Wells;T. Wengler;N. Wermes;G. W. Wilson;J. A. Wilson;G. Wolf;T. R. Wyatt;S. Yamashita;D. Zer-Zion;L. Zivkovic. - In: THE EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL. C, PARTICLES AND FIELDS. - ISSN 1434-6044. - ELETTRONICO. - 71:(2011), pp. 1-21. [10.1140/epjc/s10052-011-1733-z]
G. Abbiendi;C. Ainsley;P. F. Åkesson;G. Alexander;G. Anagnostou;K. J. Anderson;S. Asai;D. Axen;I. Bailey;E. Barberio;T. Barillari;R. J. Barlow;R. J. Batley;P. Bechtle;T. Behnke;K. W. Bell;P. J. Bell;G. Bella;A. Bellerive;G. Benelli;S. Bethke;O. Biebel;O. Boeriu;P. Bock;M. Boutemeur;S. Braibant;R. M. Brown;H. J. Burckhart;S. Campana;P. Capiluppi;R. K. Carnegie;A. A. Carter;J. R. Carter;C. Y. Chang;D. G. Charlton;C. Ciocca;A. Csilling;M. Cuffiani;S. Dado;M. Dallavalle;A. Roeck;E. A. Wolf;K. Desch;B. Dienes;J. Dubbert;E. Duchovni;G. Duckeck;I. P. Duerdoth;E. Etzion;F. Fabbri;P. Ferrari;F. Fiedler;I. Fleck;M. Ford;A. Frey;P. Gagnon;J. W. Gary;C. Geich-Gimbel;G. Giacomelli;P. Giacomelli;M. Giunta;J. Goldberg;E. Gross;J. Grunhaus;M. Gruwé;A. Gupta;C. Hajdu;M. Hamann;G. G. Hanson;A. Harel;M. Hauschild;C. M. Hawkes;R. Hawkings;G. Herten;R. D. Heuer;J. C. Hill;D. Horváth;P. Igo-Kemenes;K. Ishii;H. Jeremie;P. Jovanovic;T. R. Junk;J. Kanzaki;D. Karlen;K. Kawagoe;T. Kawamoto;R. K. Keeler;R. G. Kellogg;B. W. Kennedy;S. Kluth;T. Kobayashi;M. Kobel;S. Komamiya;T. Krämer;A. Krasznahorkay;P. Krieger;J. Krogh;T. Kuhl;M. Kupper;G. D. Lafferty;H. Landsman;D. Lanske;D. Lellouch;J. Letts;L. Levinson;J. Lillich;S. L. Lloyd;F. K. Loebinger;J. Lu;A. Ludwig;J. Ludwig;W. Mader;S. Marcellini;A. J. Martin;T. Mashimo;P. Mättig;J. McKenna;R. A. McPherson;F. Meijers;W. Menges;F. S. Merritt;H. Mes;N. Meyer;A. Michelini;S. Mihara;G. Mikenberg;D. J. Miller;W. Mohr;T. Mori;A. Mutter;K. Nagai;I. Nakamura;H. Nanjo;H. A. Neal;S. W. O’Neale;A. Oh;M. J. Oreglia;S. Orito;C. Pahl;G. Pásztor;J. R. Pater;J. E. Pilcher;J. Pinfold;D. E. Plane;O. Pooth;M. Przybycień;A. Quadt;K. Rabbertz;C. Rembser;P. Renkel;J. M. Roney;A. M. Rossi;Y. Rozen;K. Runge;K. Sachs;T. Saeki;E. K. G. Sarkisyan;A. D. Schaile;O. Schaile;P. Scharff-Hansen;J. Schieck;T. Schörner-Sadenius;M. Schröder;M. Schumacher;R. Seuster;T. G. Shears;B. C. Shen;P. Sherwood;A. Skuja;A. M. Smith;R. Sobie;S. Söldner-Rembold;F. Spano;A. Stahl;D. Strom;R. Ströhmer;S. Tarem;M. Tasevsky;R. Teuscher;M. A. Thomson;E. Torrence;D. Toya;I. Trigger;Z. Trócsányi;E. Tsur;M. F. Turner-Watson;I. Ueda;B. Ujvári;C. F. Vollmer;P. Vannerem;R. Vértesi;M. Verzocchi;H. Voss;J. Vossebeld;C. P. Ward;D. R. Ward;P. M. Watkins;A. T. Watson;N. K. Watson;P. S. Wells;T. Wengler;N. Wermes;G. W. Wilson;J. A. Wilson;G. Wolf;T. R. Wyatt;S. Yamashita;D. Zer-Zion;L. Zivkovic
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/150511
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 53
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 46
social impact