Background: An early drop of HCV-RNA levels is useful in assessing response to antiviral treatment in chronic hepatitis C; the first recommended time point is 4 weeks after the start of therapy. Objectives: We evaluated retrospectively HCV-RNA and HCVAg levels at different time points to assess the clinical value of an early monitoring. Study design: Thirty-five patients with chronic hepatitis C infected by genotype 1b and consecutively enrolled in an open-label study on PegIFN plus Ribavirin and/or ketoprofene were tested for HCV-RNA (real-time PCR) and HCVAg (ARCHITECT) at baseline and after 1 and 2 days and 1, 2, 4 and 12 weeks after the start of treatment. Treatment response was assessed according to the EASL consensus criteria. Results: In the 17 sustained responders (SR) the median log decrease of HCV-RNA and HCVAg at the different time points was 0.40 and 0.37; 1.36 and 0.84; 1.47 and 0.97; 2.34 and 1.86; 2.51 and 2.32; 3.28 and 2.61, respectively. The best time point to predict SR was 2 weeks after the start of therapy, with a sensitivity, specificity and overall accuracy of 76.9%, 86.7% and 82.1% for HCV-RNA and 81.8%, 75.0% and 76.8% for HCVAg, respectively. Discussion: An early monitoring is at least equally effective than standard monitoring in predicting response to hepatitis C therapy. The similarity of HCV-RNA and HCVAg kinetics suggests that HCVAg may be useful in the early phases as a trigger to evaluate HCV-RNA levels at earlier time points for a personalized approach to therapy monitoring.
Loggi E, Cursaro C, Scuteri A, Grandini E, Panno AM, Galli S, et al. (2013). Patterns of HCV-RNA and HCV core antigen in the early monitoring of standard treatment for chronic hepatitis C. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY, 56, 291-295 [10.1016/j.jcv.2012.11.012].
Patterns of HCV-RNA and HCV core antigen in the early monitoring of standard treatment for chronic hepatitis C.
LOGGI, ELISABETTA;GRANDINI, ELENA;BERNARDI, MAURO;ANDREONE, PIETRO
2013
Abstract
Background: An early drop of HCV-RNA levels is useful in assessing response to antiviral treatment in chronic hepatitis C; the first recommended time point is 4 weeks after the start of therapy. Objectives: We evaluated retrospectively HCV-RNA and HCVAg levels at different time points to assess the clinical value of an early monitoring. Study design: Thirty-five patients with chronic hepatitis C infected by genotype 1b and consecutively enrolled in an open-label study on PegIFN plus Ribavirin and/or ketoprofene were tested for HCV-RNA (real-time PCR) and HCVAg (ARCHITECT) at baseline and after 1 and 2 days and 1, 2, 4 and 12 weeks after the start of treatment. Treatment response was assessed according to the EASL consensus criteria. Results: In the 17 sustained responders (SR) the median log decrease of HCV-RNA and HCVAg at the different time points was 0.40 and 0.37; 1.36 and 0.84; 1.47 and 0.97; 2.34 and 1.86; 2.51 and 2.32; 3.28 and 2.61, respectively. The best time point to predict SR was 2 weeks after the start of therapy, with a sensitivity, specificity and overall accuracy of 76.9%, 86.7% and 82.1% for HCV-RNA and 81.8%, 75.0% and 76.8% for HCVAg, respectively. Discussion: An early monitoring is at least equally effective than standard monitoring in predicting response to hepatitis C therapy. The similarity of HCV-RNA and HCVAg kinetics suggests that HCVAg may be useful in the early phases as a trigger to evaluate HCV-RNA levels at earlier time points for a personalized approach to therapy monitoring.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.