AIM: Role of 18F-DOPA PET/CT in neuroblastoma (NB) compared with CT/MR. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In all, 21 patients (M:F = 14:7; mean age, 7.4 years) affected by advanced stage NB (III-IV) were prospectively enrolled. Overall, 37 paired 18F-DOPA PET and CT/MR scans were performed, and for each, we identified site and number of lesions. Standard of reference was based on a multidisciplinary assessment, including 123I-MIBG, selective biopsy, and clinical-instrumental monitoring. Both scan-based and a lesion-based analysis was performed, and for each modality, we calculated sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value (PPV), and accuracy. RESULTS: On the scan-based analysis, 18F-DOPA PET and CT/MR showed the following rates: sensitivity, specificity, NPV, PPV, and accuracy were 100%, 92.3%, 100%, 96%, and 97.3% versus 91.7%, 61.5%, 80%, 81.5%, and 81.1%, respectively (P = 0.014). Overall 179 findings were reported at imaging, of which 139 (77.7%) resulted true sites of disease at final outcome. On the lesion-based analysis, the 2 imaging modalities showed the following sensitivity, specificity, NPV, PPV, and accuracy rates: 90.6%, 90%, 73.5%, 96.9%, and 90.5% versus 47.5%, 27.5%, 13.1%, 69.5%, and 43% (P < 0.00001). CONCLUSIONS: In our study, 18F-DOPA PET/CT results more accurate than CT/MR in advanced stage NB therefore should be taken into consideration for the diagnostic workup of these patients.

18F-DOPA PET/CT in neuroblastoma: comparison of conventional imaging with CT/MR / Lopci E.; Piccardo A.; Nanni C.; Altrinetti V.; Garaventa A.; Pession A.; Cistaro A.; Chiti A.; Villavecchia G.; Fanti S.. - In: CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE. - ISSN 0363-9762. - STAMPA. - 37:(2012), pp. 73-78. [10.1097/RLU.0b013e3182485172]

18F-DOPA PET/CT in neuroblastoma: comparison of conventional imaging with CT/MR.

NANNI, CRISTINA;PESSION, ANDREA;FANTI, STEFANO
2012

Abstract

AIM: Role of 18F-DOPA PET/CT in neuroblastoma (NB) compared with CT/MR. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In all, 21 patients (M:F = 14:7; mean age, 7.4 years) affected by advanced stage NB (III-IV) were prospectively enrolled. Overall, 37 paired 18F-DOPA PET and CT/MR scans were performed, and for each, we identified site and number of lesions. Standard of reference was based on a multidisciplinary assessment, including 123I-MIBG, selective biopsy, and clinical-instrumental monitoring. Both scan-based and a lesion-based analysis was performed, and for each modality, we calculated sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value (PPV), and accuracy. RESULTS: On the scan-based analysis, 18F-DOPA PET and CT/MR showed the following rates: sensitivity, specificity, NPV, PPV, and accuracy were 100%, 92.3%, 100%, 96%, and 97.3% versus 91.7%, 61.5%, 80%, 81.5%, and 81.1%, respectively (P = 0.014). Overall 179 findings were reported at imaging, of which 139 (77.7%) resulted true sites of disease at final outcome. On the lesion-based analysis, the 2 imaging modalities showed the following sensitivity, specificity, NPV, PPV, and accuracy rates: 90.6%, 90%, 73.5%, 96.9%, and 90.5% versus 47.5%, 27.5%, 13.1%, 69.5%, and 43% (P < 0.00001). CONCLUSIONS: In our study, 18F-DOPA PET/CT results more accurate than CT/MR in advanced stage NB therefore should be taken into consideration for the diagnostic workup of these patients.
2012
18F-DOPA PET/CT in neuroblastoma: comparison of conventional imaging with CT/MR / Lopci E.; Piccardo A.; Nanni C.; Altrinetti V.; Garaventa A.; Pession A.; Cistaro A.; Chiti A.; Villavecchia G.; Fanti S.. - In: CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE. - ISSN 0363-9762. - STAMPA. - 37:(2012), pp. 73-78. [10.1097/RLU.0b013e3182485172]
Lopci E.; Piccardo A.; Nanni C.; Altrinetti V.; Garaventa A.; Pession A.; Cistaro A.; Chiti A.; Villavecchia G.; Fanti S.
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/132307
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 8
  • Scopus 58
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 43
social impact