AIM: Role of 18F-DOPA PET/CT in neuroblastoma (NB) compared with CT/MR. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In all, 21 patients (M:F = 14:7; mean age, 7.4 years) affected by advanced stage NB (III-IV) were prospectively enrolled. Overall, 37 paired 18F-DOPA PET and CT/MR scans were performed, and for each, we identified site and number of lesions. Standard of reference was based on a multidisciplinary assessment, including 123I-MIBG, selective biopsy, and clinical-instrumental monitoring. Both scan-based and a lesion-based analysis was performed, and for each modality, we calculated sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value (PPV), and accuracy. RESULTS: On the scan-based analysis, 18F-DOPA PET and CT/MR showed the following rates: sensitivity, specificity, NPV, PPV, and accuracy were 100%, 92.3%, 100%, 96%, and 97.3% versus 91.7%, 61.5%, 80%, 81.5%, and 81.1%, respectively (P = 0.014). Overall 179 findings were reported at imaging, of which 139 (77.7%) resulted true sites of disease at final outcome. On the lesion-based analysis, the 2 imaging modalities showed the following sensitivity, specificity, NPV, PPV, and accuracy rates: 90.6%, 90%, 73.5%, 96.9%, and 90.5% versus 47.5%, 27.5%, 13.1%, 69.5%, and 43% (P < 0.00001). CONCLUSIONS: In our study, 18F-DOPA PET/CT results more accurate than CT/MR in advanced stage NB therefore should be taken into consideration for the diagnostic workup of these patients.

Lopci E., Piccardo A., Nanni C., Altrinetti V., Garaventa A., Pession A., et al. (2012). 18F-DOPA PET/CT in neuroblastoma: comparison of conventional imaging with CT/MR. CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 37, 73-78 [10.1097/RLU.0b013e3182485172].

18F-DOPA PET/CT in neuroblastoma: comparison of conventional imaging with CT/MR.

NANNI, CRISTINA;PESSION, ANDREA;FANTI, STEFANO
2012

Abstract

AIM: Role of 18F-DOPA PET/CT in neuroblastoma (NB) compared with CT/MR. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In all, 21 patients (M:F = 14:7; mean age, 7.4 years) affected by advanced stage NB (III-IV) were prospectively enrolled. Overall, 37 paired 18F-DOPA PET and CT/MR scans were performed, and for each, we identified site and number of lesions. Standard of reference was based on a multidisciplinary assessment, including 123I-MIBG, selective biopsy, and clinical-instrumental monitoring. Both scan-based and a lesion-based analysis was performed, and for each modality, we calculated sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value (PPV), and accuracy. RESULTS: On the scan-based analysis, 18F-DOPA PET and CT/MR showed the following rates: sensitivity, specificity, NPV, PPV, and accuracy were 100%, 92.3%, 100%, 96%, and 97.3% versus 91.7%, 61.5%, 80%, 81.5%, and 81.1%, respectively (P = 0.014). Overall 179 findings were reported at imaging, of which 139 (77.7%) resulted true sites of disease at final outcome. On the lesion-based analysis, the 2 imaging modalities showed the following sensitivity, specificity, NPV, PPV, and accuracy rates: 90.6%, 90%, 73.5%, 96.9%, and 90.5% versus 47.5%, 27.5%, 13.1%, 69.5%, and 43% (P < 0.00001). CONCLUSIONS: In our study, 18F-DOPA PET/CT results more accurate than CT/MR in advanced stage NB therefore should be taken into consideration for the diagnostic workup of these patients.
2012
Lopci E., Piccardo A., Nanni C., Altrinetti V., Garaventa A., Pession A., et al. (2012). 18F-DOPA PET/CT in neuroblastoma: comparison of conventional imaging with CT/MR. CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 37, 73-78 [10.1097/RLU.0b013e3182485172].
Lopci E.; Piccardo A.; Nanni C.; Altrinetti V.; Garaventa A.; Pession A.; Cistaro A.; Chiti A.; Villavecchia G.; Fanti S.
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/132307
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 8
  • Scopus 61
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 45
social impact