Industrial quality inspection encompasses tasks ranging from metrological verification and surface-defect detection to feature checking and assembly conformity assessment. The last of these still often depends on operators interpreting technical drawings and following checklist-based procedures, which can make the process slow, variable, and difficult to trace. This paper describes a CAD-driven augmented reality (AR) workflow for component-level conformity checking of industrial assemblies. CAD/MBD product data are converted into inspection content, component-specific regions of interest (ROIs), and runtime references for shop-floor use. A commercial AR tracker aligns the CAD model with the physical assembly. Custom Unity and OpenCV modules then isolate the selected component and compare CAD-derived and observed edge maps within the same ROI. Small residual registration errors are accommodated by a Gaussian-weighted distance-tolerant score, while an orientation-consistency cue helps interpret ambiguous cases. Each check generates a structured record containing component identity, similarity indicators, decision state, and traceability information. Product structure, operator-guided checking, visual evidence, and quality records thus remain connected throughout the workflow. In Quality 4.0 terms, the system provides a Detect and evidence-capture layer for missing, inconsistent, or uncertain component-level evidence. The evaluation covers 13 industrial assemblies and 927 component-level instances, using transparent CAD-to-image baselines, ROI ablation, degenerate-case and sensitivity analyses, and a controlled missing-component pilot. The results show that CAD-driven masking reduces off-component edge contamination, while conservative decision states identify weak or fragmented evidence that requires reacquisition or operator verification.
Grandi, F., De Ciantis, R., Romoli, T., Lipparini, G., Peruzzini, M. (2026). CAD-to-VR framework for interactive assembly simulation in product design review. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, on line first, 1-23 [10.1007/s00170-026-18870-4].
CAD-to-VR framework for interactive assembly simulation in product design review
Grandi, Fabio;De Ciantis, Rocco;Romoli, Tommaso;Lipparini, Giorgio;Peruzzini, Margherita
2026
Abstract
Industrial quality inspection encompasses tasks ranging from metrological verification and surface-defect detection to feature checking and assembly conformity assessment. The last of these still often depends on operators interpreting technical drawings and following checklist-based procedures, which can make the process slow, variable, and difficult to trace. This paper describes a CAD-driven augmented reality (AR) workflow for component-level conformity checking of industrial assemblies. CAD/MBD product data are converted into inspection content, component-specific regions of interest (ROIs), and runtime references for shop-floor use. A commercial AR tracker aligns the CAD model with the physical assembly. Custom Unity and OpenCV modules then isolate the selected component and compare CAD-derived and observed edge maps within the same ROI. Small residual registration errors are accommodated by a Gaussian-weighted distance-tolerant score, while an orientation-consistency cue helps interpret ambiguous cases. Each check generates a structured record containing component identity, similarity indicators, decision state, and traceability information. Product structure, operator-guided checking, visual evidence, and quality records thus remain connected throughout the workflow. In Quality 4.0 terms, the system provides a Detect and evidence-capture layer for missing, inconsistent, or uncertain component-level evidence. The evaluation covers 13 industrial assemblies and 927 component-level instances, using transparent CAD-to-image baselines, ROI ablation, degenerate-case and sensitivity analyses, and a controlled missing-component pilot. The results show that CAD-driven masking reduces off-component edge contamination, while conservative decision states identify weak or fragmented evidence that requires reacquisition or operator verification.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
1-s2.0-S2452414X26001524-main.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipo:
Versione (PDF) editoriale / Version Of Record
Licenza:
Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione (CCBY)
Dimensione
8.44 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
8.44 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.



