This paper analyses the implementation of Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) into the transcription workflow of the KIParla corpus, a resource of spoken Italian. Through a two-phase experiment, 11 expert and novice transcribers produced both manual and ASR-assisted transcriptions of identical audio segments across three different types of conversation, which were subsequently analyzed through a combination of statistical modeling, word-level alignment and a series of annotation-based metrics. Results show that ASR-assisted workflows can increase transcription speed but do not consistently improve overall accuracy, with effects depending on multiple factors such as workflow configuration, conversation type and annotator experience. Analyses combining alignment-based metrics, descriptive statistics and statistical modeling provide a systematic framework to monitor transcription behavior across annotators and workflows. Despite limitations, ASR-assisted transcription, potentially supported by task-specific fine-tuning, could be integrated into the KIParla transcription workflow to accelerate corpus creation without compromising transcription quality.
Simonotti, M., Pannitto, L., Zucchini, E., Ballarè, S., Mauri, C. (2026). Is Semi-Automatic Transcription Useful in Corpus Creation? Preliminary Considerations on the KIParla Corpus. European Language Resources Association (ELRA) [10.63317/3gw6i7cbs5rc].
Is Semi-Automatic Transcription Useful in Corpus Creation? Preliminary Considerations on the KIParla Corpus
Simonotti, Martina
;Pannitto, Ludovica;Zucchini, Eleonora;Ballarè, Silvia;Mauri, Caterina
2026
Abstract
This paper analyses the implementation of Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) into the transcription workflow of the KIParla corpus, a resource of spoken Italian. Through a two-phase experiment, 11 expert and novice transcribers produced both manual and ASR-assisted transcriptions of identical audio segments across three different types of conversation, which were subsequently analyzed through a combination of statistical modeling, word-level alignment and a series of annotation-based metrics. Results show that ASR-assisted workflows can increase transcription speed but do not consistently improve overall accuracy, with effects depending on multiple factors such as workflow configuration, conversation type and annotator experience. Analyses combining alignment-based metrics, descriptive statistics and statistical modeling provide a systematic framework to monitor transcription behavior across annotators and workflows. Despite limitations, ASR-assisted transcription, potentially supported by task-specific fine-tuning, could be integrated into the KIParla transcription workflow to accelerate corpus creation without compromising transcription quality.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
2026.lrec2026-1.520.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: Contributo in Atti di Convegno
Tipo:
Versione (PDF) editoriale / Version Of Record
Licenza:
Licenza per accesso libero gratuito
Dimensione
673.27 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
673.27 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.



