Remote sensing (RS) technologies generate large amounts of data that can be highly valuable for supporting field zonation and precision agriculture. However, numerous processing approaches have been proposed, with no clear guidelines for their application. This study aims to assess the effects of (i) the vegetation index (VI), (ii) the clustering algorithm, and (iii) the timing of image acquisition on the quality and consistency of zonation results. Sentinel-2 images were analyzed over two growing seasons at two experimental sites in Northern Italy. Several ground observations were integrated to define the benchmark. The results indicated that the choice of VI and clustering method had only a minor effect on zonation, whereas image selection had a significant influence. The best results were obtained during the crop growing season and under dry conditions. Overall, this study demonstrates that systematic analyses can provide practical guidance for implementing RS technologies to support precision management practices.

Hasanli, G., Emamalizadeh, S., Mazzoleni, R., Benfenati, M., Baroni, G. (2026). A systematic assessment of remote sensing approaches for agricultural zonation and supporting precision agriculture. SMART AGRICULTURAL TECHNOLOGY, 13, 1-9 [10.1016/j.atech.2026.101911].

A systematic assessment of remote sensing approaches for agricultural zonation and supporting precision agriculture

Hasanli, Gunay
;
Emamalizadeh, Sadra;Mazzoleni, Riccardo;Benfenati, Marco;Baroni, Gabriele
Ultimo
2026

Abstract

Remote sensing (RS) technologies generate large amounts of data that can be highly valuable for supporting field zonation and precision agriculture. However, numerous processing approaches have been proposed, with no clear guidelines for their application. This study aims to assess the effects of (i) the vegetation index (VI), (ii) the clustering algorithm, and (iii) the timing of image acquisition on the quality and consistency of zonation results. Sentinel-2 images were analyzed over two growing seasons at two experimental sites in Northern Italy. Several ground observations were integrated to define the benchmark. The results indicated that the choice of VI and clustering method had only a minor effect on zonation, whereas image selection had a significant influence. The best results were obtained during the crop growing season and under dry conditions. Overall, this study demonstrates that systematic analyses can provide practical guidance for implementing RS technologies to support precision management practices.
2026
Hasanli, G., Emamalizadeh, S., Mazzoleni, R., Benfenati, M., Baroni, G. (2026). A systematic assessment of remote sensing approaches for agricultural zonation and supporting precision agriculture. SMART AGRICULTURAL TECHNOLOGY, 13, 1-9 [10.1016/j.atech.2026.101911].
Hasanli, Gunay; Emamalizadeh, Sadra; Mazzoleni, Riccardo; Benfenati, Marco; Baroni, Gabriele
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
1-s2.0-S2772375526001358-main.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipo: Versione (PDF) editoriale / Version Of Record
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate (CCBYNCND)
Dimensione 9.97 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
9.97 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
1-s2.0-S2772375526001358-mmc1.docx

accesso aperto

Tipo: File Supplementare
Licenza: Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate (CCBYNCND)
Dimensione 747.96 kB
Formato Microsoft Word XML
747.96 kB Microsoft Word XML Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/1050477
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact