Background and Context: This study investigates how third-grade Italian students (aged 8) learn definite (‘repeat n times’) iteration, using either a puzzle-based or Use-Modify-Create (UMC) instructional approach, both delivered on the Code.org Studio platform. Objective: To verify the effectiveness of these approaches in teaching definite iteration, capturing any differences in students’performance and learning experience. Method: A quasi-experimental study (93 teachers, 1434 students), with pre- and post-intervention assessments, and a learning intervention of 4 one-hour lessons, directly delivered by teachers. Findings: Both approaches proved successful. Students who experienced the puzzle-based approach performed slightly better. The UMC approach proved nearly as effective, earning slight preference by participants. Implications: Both approaches proved suitable for early primary education. This work helps frame the puzzle-based approach as a teaching method, and provides tested instructional materials grounded in the UMC approach, adapted to the Code.org Studio environment.

Capecchi, S., Forlizzi, L., Fronza, I., Lodi, M., Lonati, V., Melideo, G., et al. (2025). Puzzle-based vs UMC approaches for learning iteration in grade 3. COMPUTER SCIENCE EDUCATION, 0, 1-44 [10.1080/08993408.2025.2542669].

Puzzle-based vs UMC approaches for learning iteration in grade 3

Michael Lodi;
2025

Abstract

Background and Context: This study investigates how third-grade Italian students (aged 8) learn definite (‘repeat n times’) iteration, using either a puzzle-based or Use-Modify-Create (UMC) instructional approach, both delivered on the Code.org Studio platform. Objective: To verify the effectiveness of these approaches in teaching definite iteration, capturing any differences in students’performance and learning experience. Method: A quasi-experimental study (93 teachers, 1434 students), with pre- and post-intervention assessments, and a learning intervention of 4 one-hour lessons, directly delivered by teachers. Findings: Both approaches proved successful. Students who experienced the puzzle-based approach performed slightly better. The UMC approach proved nearly as effective, earning slight preference by participants. Implications: Both approaches proved suitable for early primary education. This work helps frame the puzzle-based approach as a teaching method, and provides tested instructional materials grounded in the UMC approach, adapted to the Code.org Studio environment.
2025
Capecchi, S., Forlizzi, L., Fronza, I., Lodi, M., Lonati, V., Melideo, G., et al. (2025). Puzzle-based vs UMC approaches for learning iteration in grade 3. COMPUTER SCIENCE EDUCATION, 0, 1-44 [10.1080/08993408.2025.2542669].
Capecchi, Sara; Forlizzi, Luca; Fronza, Ilenia; Lodi, Michael; Lonati, Violetta; Melideo, Giovanna; Monga, Mattia; Nardelli, Enrico; Rossano, Veronica...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
Eventuali allegati, non sono esposti

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11585/1045337
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact