The Russian Counterparts of Italian Periphrases with Aspectual Value This contribution focuses on the realization in Russian of certain Italian aspectual periphra-ses – (in)cominciare/iniziare a, continuare a, cercare/tentare di using data from the Russian-Italian parallel corpus of the National Corpus of the Russian Language (nkrja). The theoretical framework adopted is based on the idea that the choice of aspectual forms in Slavic languages is determined by the lexical or actional classes of verbs: the natural, prototypical forms of telic verbs (achieve-ments and accomplishments) are perfective, whereas those of atelic verbs (states and activities) are imperfective. Conversely, the forms of the opposite aspect activated for each class represent marked, peripheral choices with respect to the prototype. The comparison of the Italian periphrases with equivalent Russian verbal forms extracted from the corpus shows that they often correspond to sim-ple aspectual forms in Russian, which quite systematically represent peripheral aspectual choices. As a result, Italian periphrases corresponding to Russian marked aspectual forms explicitly convey the additional semantic load that differentiates them from their unmarked, prototypical counterparts. Since Russian aspectual forms are synthetic and polysemous, the presence of periphrases with the hypothesized semantic value in Italian supports the validity of the adopted theoretical framework.
Biagini, F., Gebert, L. (2025). Gli equivalenti russi delle perifrasi verbali a valore aspettuale in italiano. STUDI SLAVISTICI, 22(1), 87-104 [10.36253/Studi_Slavis-16981].
Gli equivalenti russi delle perifrasi verbali a valore aspettuale in italiano
Francesca Biagini;
2025
Abstract
The Russian Counterparts of Italian Periphrases with Aspectual Value This contribution focuses on the realization in Russian of certain Italian aspectual periphra-ses – (in)cominciare/iniziare a, continuare a, cercare/tentare di using data from the Russian-Italian parallel corpus of the National Corpus of the Russian Language (nkrja). The theoretical framework adopted is based on the idea that the choice of aspectual forms in Slavic languages is determined by the lexical or actional classes of verbs: the natural, prototypical forms of telic verbs (achieve-ments and accomplishments) are perfective, whereas those of atelic verbs (states and activities) are imperfective. Conversely, the forms of the opposite aspect activated for each class represent marked, peripheral choices with respect to the prototype. The comparison of the Italian periphrases with equivalent Russian verbal forms extracted from the corpus shows that they often correspond to sim-ple aspectual forms in Russian, which quite systematically represent peripheral aspectual choices. As a result, Italian periphrases corresponding to Russian marked aspectual forms explicitly convey the additional semantic load that differentiates them from their unmarked, prototypical counterparts. Since Russian aspectual forms are synthetic and polysemous, the presence of periphrases with the hypothesized semantic value in Italian supports the validity of the adopted theoretical framework.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
StSl+2025_1_A5_Biagini+Gebert (1).pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: Articolo
Tipo:
Versione (PDF) editoriale / Version Of Record
Licenza:
Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione (CCBY)
Dimensione
275.58 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
275.58 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
|
Metadati 948-582-PB-1-5.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: Metadati
Tipo:
File Supplementare
Licenza:
Licenza per Accesso Aperto. Creative Commons Attribuzione (CCBY)
Dimensione
389.54 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
389.54 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


