Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes—With a Focus on Older Populations: An AI-Assisted Rapid Review of Use and Implementation in Clinical and Organizational Practice

Background/Objectives: The aging global population has led to a rising prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), in which biomedical outcomes alone fail to capture patients’ lived experiences. Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) can provide insights into psychological, psychosocial, and quality-of-life (QoL) dimensions, yet their use—particularly among older adults—remains inconsistent. This AI-assisted rapid review aimed to map how PROMs are currently applied in adults with T2DM, with specific attention to studies involving older populations, focusing on their role in assessing well-being, distress, depression, and treatment satisfaction, as well as their implementation in clinical and organizational practice. Methods: A rapid review was conducted using Elicit, an AI tool designed to support systematic evidence synthesis. Studies published between 2015 and 2025 were identified from Semantic Scholar, complemented by manual searches for recent or unindexed papers. Eligibility criteria required inclusion of adults with T2DM and use of validated PROMs in real-world settings. Studies explicitly describing older or elderly subgroups were highlighted separately. After screening 504 records, 167 studies were included. Data extraction covered study design, instruments used, populations, outcomes, and implementation details. Results: The most frequently assessed outcomes were diabetes distress, depression, QoL, treatment satisfaction, and self-efficacy. Common instruments included PAID, DDS, PHQ-9, WHO-5, EQ-5D, SF-36, DTSQ, and GDS. Evidence showed PROMs effectively identified high-risk patients and informed tailored interventions, but integration into routine care remained limited. Barriers included workflow disruption, lack of provider training, heterogeneity of tools, and insufficient cultural validation. Facilitators included brief instruments, digital administration, and linkage with care planning. Conclusions: PROMs are valuable in capturing psychosocial and psychological burdens in adults with T2DM, including but not limited to older populations, but routine implementation is inconsistent. Broader adoption will require digital infrastructure, clinician training, and organizational integration, as well as the development of PROMs that capture experiences with emerging diabetes technologies. Methodologically, this study illustrates the feasibility of AI-assisted rapid reviews to generate timely, evidence-informed syntheses.